• @TheGrandNagus
    link
    English
    4427 days ago

    It’s because the drink manufacturers mostly just stopped selling the full sugar versions

    Which was a result of the sugar tax. They didn’t just suddenly drop the sugar content for no reason.

    • Liz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      127 days ago

      The sugar tax didn’t include artificial sweeteners? That’s an oversight. Those things are bad for you in ways that are different from digestable sugars.

      • @TheGrandNagus
        link
        English
        6
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        They’re nowhere near as bad as consuming a huge amount of sugar.

        They only cause issues for a vanishingly tiny amount of people that have pre-existing genetic conditions.

        • @EnderMB
          link
          English
          026 days ago

          That’s highly debatable. It’s swapping one set of side effects for another, especially when drunk at high volumes.

          • @TheGrandNagus
            link
            English
            6
            edit-2
            26 days ago

            It’s not highly debatable, it’s been studied to death. Sweeteners have existed for a long time.

            There were rumours they cause cancer, this has been proven false. There were rumours they cause headaches, this has been proven false. There were rumours they cause infertility, this has been proven false. There have been rumours they stimulate your appetite, this likewise has zero scientific backing.

            Aspartame, the most common sweetener, does cause issues for people with phenylketonuria, a rare genetic disorder, because it contains stuff they can’t metabolise. But so does a long list of foods people eat every day.

            Some polyol sweeteners have a mild laxative effect if consumed in very high quantities, but the same is true for stuff like tea, coffee, most fruits, etc.

            Sugar is far worse for your health.