• @Viking_Hippie
    link
    65 months ago

    MBFC has a team of multiple writers and researchers - hardly a one-person “hobby.”

    It’s one guy who sometimes has the help of volunteers and paid freelancers, with no transparency as to who writes and researches what and as evidenced by their thoroughly negligent

    They are highly rated by other organizations like Snopes, Newsguard, NPR, Reuters Fact Chek, etc.

    That’s probably more to do with collegial courtesy/not wanting beef with Dave than all of his competitors (and NPR, whose own standards have been slipping perilously in recent decades) actually thinking that he’s great at it.

    Or it could not even be that. Your implicit trust in the Hasbara along with you completely ignoring the substantive parts of my comment implies that you may have just made up their trust in Dave from whole cloth 🤷

      • @Viking_Hippie
        link
        5
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Here’s that analysis with true statements marked green, mostly false ones marked blue, and complete and utter nonsense marked red

        A perfect score full of obvious errors isn’t worth much.

        MBFC Dave is actually far more reliable and trusted propped up by the [main stream] news industry and scientific community commercial fact guessers than I realized

        Fixed that for you.

        Dave and his site are only slightly more reliable on matters pertaining to Israel than the spokesperson for the IDF.