• JasSmith
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    My home is an ad free zone. I pay for Premium and I’d pay for no commercials, but since that isn’t an option, I block them.

    This war on SponsorBlock is reminiscent of the 80s and the war on VCRs. Advertisers tried to make taping things illegal because they argued people would fast forward through commercials. They were right, but that doesn’t mean we don’t have the right to choose what we watch.

    • awsamation
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Nobody here is trying to force you to stop using it though.

      They explained why they don’t use sponsorblock, and why they believe you shouldn’t either. But the choice is still yours.

      Theres is a wide gap between offering a perspective on why watching the sponsorships is worthwhile, and trying to legally force you.

      • JasSmith
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        I didn’t accuse them of trying to force me to stop using SponsorBlock. They gave their opinion, so I gave mine. That’s kind of how this works here.

        • awsamation
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          But you did go on to compare this situation to the war on VCRs. Which I think is a poor comparison. You gave your opinion, so I gave mine. That’s kind of how this works here for everyone, not just for you.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      /u/aluminium is arguing for something like VCR companies building a way to skip ads automatically - I paid for the VCR and I don’t want to see ads It’s not their problem what your preference is, and they aren’t incentived enough to care.

      YouTube doesn’t even strictly know what the sponsor conversion rate is, since they aren’t involved in the deal

      Louis Rossmann made a great point a long time ago - adblock my videos and donate me a dollar. That dollar is more that I’d ever get from you as an individual via Adsense or sponsor spots.