• @meant2live218
    link
    41
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Am I crazy for not wanting anyone to get shot? I know how crazy our politics are getting, and I’m afraid of the future, but we shouldn’t be wanting anyone to be shot at. Life is life, even if it’s attached to the absolute worst person on Earth. Sure, lock up people who are a danger to society, but let’s not celebrate gun violence.

    • @Linkerbaan
      link
      234 months ago

      Trump is responsible for locking people in cages and having them die in there. And after being notified he doubled down on it. And many other acts that have led to people’s deaths.

      Why are murderers above being murdered?

      • XIIIesq
        link
        7
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        If you want to talk about justice you need to maintain superior standards and morals.

        Your argument is no better than the “Saudi Arabia doesn’t allow the building of churches, so why do we allow the building of mosques?” The answer is that we’re better than fucking Saudi Arabia.

        Eye for an eye types of justice quickly become escalated and end up in a race to the bottom.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          184 months ago

          Killing Nazis IS superior standards and morals. What, you gonna tell me liberating Auschwitz was wrong because the Allies used violence? You gonna say it makes them no better than the Nazis to solve problems with guns?

          • XIIIesq
            link
            -44 months ago

            I don’t think an assassination attempt on Trump is equal to ending fascism in WWII, although I understand why it is tempting to draw a comparison.

            If you want to try normalising and rationalising assassination attempts on world leaders, then don’t act surprised when someone comes for the one you support.

            No matter how much you hate Trump, this act should absolutely be condemned.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              34 months ago

              I would be very happy if the democrats assassinated Trump and the Republicans killed Biden. Problem solved!

              But if you mean “what if the CIA assassinated communist leaders”, uhhhhhh they already do.

              • XIIIesq
                link
                04 months ago

                I think any endorsement of violence is absolutely terrible and wanting leaders shot is an extremly slippery slope.

                That’s not what I meant but it’s also something that I don’t endorse.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  24 months ago

                  Tolerating intolerance is intolerant. If you allow there to be people in your government who assassinate communist leaders, lock babies in cages, and deny lifesaving healthcare to minorities, then that stuff is gonna happen. Problems with society member got solved with wishful thinking and fairy dust. They got solved with blood. The Nazis had to be shot. The crusaders had to be stabbed. The conquistadores ought to have got arrows in their throats. It’s the same in fiction, too. Luke Skywalker didn’t get rid of the Death Star by sitting down and talking with Darth Vader, he used a bomb. Frodo and Aragorn didn’t defeat Sauron by voting, they used their swords. The Avengers didn’t debate Thanos into leaving them alone, they cut off his head with a magic axe.

                  What on earth do you think we’re supposed to do with Nazis except kill them?

                  • XIIIesq
                    link
                    0
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    I’ve already stated that equating killing Trump to ending fascism is a bit of a stretch. And you can tell me until you’re blue in the face about how much you want Trump killed, I disagree, I think it sets a terrible precedent.

                    This is real life not a fantasy film.

          • XIIIesq
            link
            84 months ago

            If you think that’s a straw man then it’s clearly not worth debating you. It’s a comment about justice in reply to a comment about justice.

              • XIIIesq
                link
                3
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Well yes, the term “straw man” is used in reference to debates, but I already knew that you’re clearly unfamiliar with the term.

                • @jose1324
                  link
                  -54 months ago

                  It’s so funny how seriously you take this

                  • XIIIesq
                    link
                    14 months ago

                    I’m glad you’re enjoying yourself!

      • @meant2live218
        link
        04 months ago

        Because we don’t have to be all “law of the wild.” Murderers deserve imprisonment, not death and endangerment.

      • XIIIesq
        link
        -24 months ago

        You need to be careful that you don’t become what you hate. There are always going to be people that you disagree with on the strongest levels.

          • XIIIesq
            link
            -24 months ago

            How many have you killed? Zero? Shut the fuck up then.

            • @Moneo
              link
              14 months ago

              These people are the leftist equivalent of the special forces spaghetti. It’s fucking weird how little self awareness they have.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      164 months ago

      If I believed everything people think Trump would do if elected, how could you ethically not want to do it yourself?

      Put every marginalized person on one track and trump on the other. Do you pull the lever?

      • @meant2live218
        link
        54 months ago

        Then I ask you: if this is how you rationalize the violence, what prevents you from doing the same?

        In a different vein of thought, does this same argument justify those on the far right who are frightened (logically or illogically) of the left threatening violence on their perceived opponents?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          94 months ago

          Then I ask you: if this is how you rationalize the violence, what prevents you from doing the same?

          Faith in humanity? Optimism? If the gas trucks roll out I won’t last long, but I’m not convinced terror is inevitable if Trump wins.

          In a different vein of thought, does this same argument justify those on the far right who are frightened (logically or illogically) of the left threatening violence on their perceived opponents?

          Most of the right’s concerns are amorphous nuttery. The left’s concerns are very concrete and frightening. They also have evidence (such as 2025) to back them up.

          If they’re honest about their concerns, I really don’t know what to think about doing nothing about it. What are you willing to sacrifice to prevent a holocaust? At the very least we should all be quietly arming ourselves. Prefer private transactions.

          My belief in robust self defense matches that of most self defense laws, and I’d wait until they’re killin’ to support armed resistance.

          • twelve20two
            link
            fedilink
            44 months ago

            If anything, everybody should really, really, really start doing workouts at home and try to get some cardio in, too

    • twelve20two
      link
      fedilink
      64 months ago

      The supreme court has kinda set things up so that he won’t face prison, though.

    • XIIIesq
      link
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Right. Endorsements of violence are not Ok just because you hate an individual.

      And to anyone endorsing what happened, I certainly hope that a group of violent people or a violent individual never decide that they hate you.