I can see this possible argument: that having their employees do both in-person and remote work allows them to identify and understand aspects of in-person work that are beneficial and missing from the remote experience, and thereby discover how to improve their product.
I won’t believe that’s why they have an RTO mandate, but I can see it as a post hoc rationalization.
How “generous” of a company dedicated to helping people doing remote work.
I can see this possible argument: that having their employees do both in-person and remote work allows them to identify and understand aspects of in-person work that are beneficial and missing from the remote experience, and thereby discover how to improve their product.
I won’t believe that’s why they have an RTO mandate, but I can see it as a post hoc rationalization.