@[email protected] to There Was An AttemptEnglish • 1 month ago... to hide the brand of her clothing on tvdiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1122arrow-down135
arrow-up187arrow-down1image... to hide the brand of her clothing on tvdiscuss.tchncs.de@[email protected] to There Was An AttemptEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-squareVaquedosolinkEnglish16•1 month agoCan somebody explain what i’m missing? The logo is blurred correctly and can’t be read
minus-square@pturn1linkEnglish19•1 month agoThe three stripes down shoulders and legs are usually indicative of a certain German sportswear brand.
minus-squareVaquedosolinkEnglish19•edit-21 month agoYeah, i recognize the brand, but i thought it had to be more than that. The purpose of censoring the logo is usually legal and to be clear what is and what is not product placement. That is done correctly, so i’d say this doesn’t fit this community
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish10•1 month agoRight, it’s not about making it impossible to tell who made the clothing, it’s about hiding the legally trademarked logos.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoIt’s sort of like blurring out the word Crocs on a pair of Crocs. There’s no point.
Can somebody explain what i’m missing? The logo is blurred correctly and can’t be read
The three stripes down shoulders and legs are usually indicative of a certain German sportswear brand.
Yeah, i recognize the brand, but i thought it had to be more than that. The purpose of censoring the logo is usually legal and to be clear what is and what is not product placement. That is done correctly, so i’d say this doesn’t fit this community
Right, it’s not about making it impossible to tell who made the clothing, it’s about hiding the legally trademarked logos.
It’s sort of like blurring out the word Crocs on a pair of Crocs. There’s no point.
Puma?