• The Snark Urge
      link
      English
      43 months ago

      Mendable and long lasting clothing needs a firm hand from policy, which can be a nettlesome issue because the concept of “fast fashion” is at the heart of the issue. Textiles produced per capita have skyrocketed, and synthetic clothes fall apart sooner and many can’t be mended as easily as traditional textiles, which leads to overconsumption and waste (i.e. “profit”). The synthetic clothes can’t be fixed and break down fast. Even nicer clothes break down faster than they should these days. Any legislative agenda to amend it would need to address repairability and durability and have serious teeth - but more to the point, it’s an aspect of capitalism that has lacked rails for so long that saying it’s gone off the rails barely makes sense.

      • sunzu
        link
        fedilink
        -33 months ago

        None of this comment is stopping people from changing their consumption habits today though

        These are not mutually exclusive but one of them can change something today, the other one requires state to pass pro consumer laws which is impossible under the current regime.

        So you are essentially advocating people do nothing instead of you know, fix their own shiti consumption habits.

        You don’t need 30 garmets per person per year… no matter how shiti the clothes are.

        • The Snark Urge
          link
          English
          23 months ago

          Personal choices matter

          I said this two comments up the chain. I was never absolving anyone of their bad consumption choices, and it’s not very fun to be spoken to as if I was.