PS.

I would for vote Kamala. I would vote for a cactus with sunglasses if it had the Democratic nomination. You would do yourself well to consider anything that is weaking the resolve of the anti-trump sentiment straight poison to your brain. We have only one job this novemeber and that is to stop trump. The Supreme Court has given him the status of king. Quit acting like your vote is sacred and start realizing your vote is your final cry before your rights are forfeited.

  • @ZMoney
    link
    -11
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    There are a lot of hypothetical conversations in this thread about fascism and “November” but for me this election is about something actually happening right now. People are being exterminated by US weapons in Gaza. I will not be voting for an administration that sanctions genocide. There has to be a political price for this kind of behavior.

    I can’t acknowledge voting for the Democratic party as “the lesser of two evils.” To me it looks like Americans are afraid of losing their country, while the rest of the world has been running for cover from American weapons for over a century. The era of American exceptionalism and impunity is over. It’s time to rejoin the rest of the world. “Fascism or genocide” is not going to cut it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      84 months ago

      “Fascism or genocide” is not going to cut it.

      That’s the choice we’ve been given though. Except it’s really more like “fascism AND genocide or just genocide”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          34 months ago

          If you consider “throwing my vote away on a third party that doesn’t stand a chance in our shitty FPTP system” a choice, then sure I guess

          • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
            link
            04 months ago

            They may not win, but if you want to make a statement then third party is the option that is neither fascism nor genocide.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              14 months ago

              Ok, except if enough people vote third party, fascism will win. So I’m not sure that “statement” is a very strong one.

              • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
                link
                14 months ago

                If enough votes 3rd party then maybe neither fascism nor genocide will win.

                You may even influence future american policy away from fascism/genocide

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  14 months ago

                  That’s a naive take at best. Until we have voting reform, 3rd parties don’t actually have a chance of winning anything. The only thing voting for a 3rd party accomplishes in our shitty FPTP system is pulling votes away from the Democratic option, making the chances better for the Republican option.

                  • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
                    link
                    1
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    That’s a naive take at best.

                    Dude, you are the one saying it’s either genocide or fascism.

                    Until we have voting reform, 3rd parties don’t actually have a chance of winning anything.

                    Agree, but winning isn’t the point you wanted to make. You wanted to avoid voting for genocide or fascism.

                    The only thing voting for a 3rd party accomplishes in our shitty FPTP system is pulling votes away from the Democratic option, making the chances better for the Republican option.

                    It sends a message to the democratic party that genocide isn’t an option, that the primary process is flawed and that you don’t belive Biden has a chance against Trump.

                    If you are sure Trump will win in your state, 3rd party is your best option.

                    If you are sure Biden will win in your state, 3rd party is your best option.

                    Only if you are in a swing state do you have to hold your nose and vote for genocide over fascism.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -54 months ago

        A vote for dems is still a vote for fascism. They’ve got 3 bills right now in congress to stifle and delegitamize leftist organizations.

        What you mean is “disrupting my day to day life fascism and genocide or status quo fascism or genocide”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          44 months ago

          Ok now you’re just calling anything you disagree with “fascism”.

          Don’t take that the wrong way - I’m not trying to defend Democrats delegitamizing leftist organizations. But words have meaning, and when you just start throwing them around at everything that bothers you, you water down that meaning.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -24 months ago

            Thats just one example of many, regarding democrats exhibiting fascist behaviors and tendencies.

            This Insistence that we not call any behavior fascist or any long standing trends problematic until they’ve reached their final form and theres nothing to be done does way more damage than calling something what it is when it checks 4 out of 5 instead of all 5 boxes

            Being less overtly fascist than Project 2025 does not automatically make something not-fascist

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              34 months ago

              You’re putting words in my mouth, on top of beating around the bush. Either say what you want to say directly, or don’t bother responding.

        • Schadrach
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          They’ve got 3 bills right now in congress to stifle and delegitamize leftist organizations.

          Which bills are these?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -14 months ago

            I’m blanking on the third one at the moment but one is to streamline stripping nonprofit status of organizations that “support terrorism” (Palestine) and the other makes any criticism whatsoever of Israel legally antisemitic hate speech which again is largely going to affect leftist orgs but will also allow the board of education to strip funding and accreditation from colleges that allow pro-Palestinian protests.

            • Schadrach
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              and the other makes any criticism whatsoever of Israel legally antisemitic hate speech which again is largely going to affect leftist orgs but will also allow the board of education to strip funding and accreditation from colleges that allow pro-Palestinian protests.

              Reading this bil…

              This is the definition of antisemitism the bill adopts: https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism

              Since the bill applies this definition to title VI, it would apply to any organization receiving federal funds subject to title VI.

              Doesn’t count all criticism of Israel, you just can’t question it’s right to self determination, the validity or potential racism of a Jewish ethnostate, or levy any criticism that wouldn’t be leveled at literally any other nation in the same scenario. You also probably couldn’t speak Ill of AIPAC since that could be deemed demonizing Jews as collective.

              Can’t strip college accreditation, could strip federal funding - basically they’d be stuck operating under the same kind of restraints a college that doesn’t want to follow title IX does.

              I find it deeply amusing though that most of the people upset about this one would have been strongly in support of it prior to 10/7/23 as a move to fight white supremacy and neo-Nazis. If it was passed back then and been turned on students now it would have been a real “be careful what you wish for” moment.

              • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
                link
                14 months ago

                Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.

                How many other countries have situations that match the Israel/Palestinian conflict?

                The state of Israel doesn’t get to hide behind antisemitism. It is a system of governance, not a person, not a race, not a religion. It cannot be offended.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -14 months ago

                You can totally criticize Israel, just not for anything they do, say, or stand for.

                So glad I can say the shape of their country looks silly #freedom

                Really would have saved us all some time if you just said you were another right wing Zionist who wants to stamp out anything left of midright Biden.

            • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
              link
              14 months ago

              I would label these as pro zionist bills.

              They have nothing to do with government provided public services.

    • ObliviousEnlightenment
      link
      54 months ago

      Why do you prefer being killed yourself and still watching genocide happen?

      • @Jiggle_Physics
        link
        54 months ago

        While watching it get even more backing from the US

        • ObliviousEnlightenment
          link
          5
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          And trump will triple that backing, hell probably send our own guys to do it. Actually stopping the genocide is not on the table rn, sorry

          • @Jiggle_Physics
            link
            44 months ago

            Yeah, if anyone is going to put US boots on the ground, it is Trump

      • @ZMoney
        link
        -54 months ago

        Because for me politics is about principles and voting for my own interests and the interests of the greater good. There are people who are running who represent those interests. The duopoly is all about scaring people into voting for one of them, and I’m not going to respond to scare tactics.

        Democracy is also about accepting multiple viewpoints and arguing your own. I won’t be intimidated by this kind of thing.

        • ObliviousEnlightenment
          link
          7
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Fam, Im not trying to intimidate you into shit. I’m scared shitless because you’re willing to toss entire demographics under the bus for people halfway across the world that probably don’t even like you. Im sympathetic to wanting to be principled, but enabling another genocide for the sake of that moral stance isnt worth it. The duopoly doesnt exist because people have no valuea, it exists because aby FTTP system will always produce a duipoly. Even if you want to change that, it’ll have to be done through one of the major parties

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            04 months ago

            This narrative that it ends with Palestinians is insane to me. Democrats are by and large openly supportive of this genocide, and its not going to end there. They’re cowtowing to the rights hatred of Muslims now, anyone who thinks they won’t move onto trans folk next chasing Republican voters because they keep telling the left to eat shit is willfully blind.

          • @ZMoney
            link
            -44 months ago

            I think that’s a naive position honestly. The major parties have in their interest the perpetuation of American imperial hegemony, at the expense of people worldwide that it considers expendable, as well as the planetary ecosystem. I have a lot more sympathy for victims of this system than people who have benefited from it (albeit indirectly or unknowingly).