• @Hawke
    link
    102 months ago

    Because like it or not, it’s not the doctors job to do whatever you want no questions asked. It’s to evaluate need, desire, and risks and advise and act accordingly.

    The doctor who would perform an unnecessary procedure without doing that is just as bad as the one who refuses. Maybe worse.

    • @Mango
      link
      -42 months ago

      It doesn’t need to be necessary. It’s not their call. It’s no different from getting an abortion.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        52 months ago

        Sterilization is quite a bit different from abortion.

        An abortion is a choice not to have a child. Sterilization is a choice to permanently alter your body such that you can never have children.

        A doctor talking to a patient to ensure they understand a procedure and it’s consequences and that those consequences are what they want when those consequences are permanent is just responsible.

        It’s entirely the patients decision, but that doesn’t mean the doctor shouldn’t confirm their intent.

        • @Mango
          link
          -22 months ago

          ಠ⁠_⁠ಠ

            • @Mango
              link
              02 months ago

              Yes you are.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                12 months ago

                Okay.

                I don’t know why you’d disapprove of doctors making sure patients understand the consequences of a permanent procedure before agreeing to do it.

                Hell, we expect tattoo artists to make sure people want the outcome they’re asking for before putting ink to skin, and to refuse if they think you might not be thinking clearly. (Most won’t actually tattoo drunk people for example).