- cross-posted to:
- politics
- cross-posted to:
- politics
Clarence Thomas has struck again.
To his impressive list of recent supreme court victories – abolishing the right to an abortion, eradicating affirmative action, undermining federal regulations, and more – the ultraconservative justice can now add thwarting the criminal prosecution of Donald Trump for hoarding classified documents.
On Monday, Judge Aileen Cannon astonished the judicial world by dismissing the case. She did so based on a widely discredited legal argument that the special counsel who brought the prosecution, Jack Smith, had been improperly appointed.
The argument, initially aired by the former US president’s lawyers, had received scant support in judicial circles, given that stretching back a quarter of a century it has been repeatedly rejected by the courts. But there was one jurist who encouraged Cannon to pursue such contrarian thinking: Thomas.
I’m starting to get tired of this canned sarcastic response that is on literally every single thread I read.
It’s starting to feel defeatist. Say it enough and the joke loses its meaning.
It is defeatist. Outside of dragging this PoS to the gallows nothing will done about it.
It’s a statement of fact. Whether you choose to feel angry or defeated by it is up to you.
Its not “defeatist” when its true. Bring back the guillotines!
The conservative injustices of the Supreme Court recently declared that anything the president does that is an “official act” (to be determined by them) cannot be prosecuted. They waited to do so until the last minute in a blatant effort to help Donald Trump, who appointed three of them, avoid prosecution. We’re way past “oh, Republicans being corrupt is just a joke, ha ha.” It’s the fucking reality we live in now, and it should make you feel furious, not defeated.