Even the teamsters are showing up.

      • @barsquid
        link
        42 months ago

        I’m glad you’re curious, you can do an internet search and find articles. You are curious, right? I mean certainly you are not asking so that you can claim it is invalid unless there is an exact year, month, and day that everyone swapped over. That would be disingenuous and bad faith argumentation. Surely you are above that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -32 months ago

          All I’m looking for is a time frame when the parties “switched”, it’s telling that you can’t provide one. Even a definitive time when the parties finished switching would be sufficient but again you seem unable to provide one.

          • @barsquid
            link
            22 months ago

            If you want a timeline please feel free to read a more in depth article about it.

              • @barsquid
                link
                -12 months ago

                Every resource about it gives times and lists specific examples like Goldwater. It’s clear you did not check and are not interested in good faith discussion. (As was obvious from the start.)

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -32 months ago

                  You should check your history better, Goldwater only opposed the 1964 civil rights act, he supported 1957, 1960, & 24th admendment. His switching had more to do with his opposition to new deal policies.

                  It was a good try, at least you attempted to provide evidence for your claim. The problem with this argument is for every dem senator or rep that changed parties there are 20 that stayed.

                  • @barsquid
                    link
                    02 months ago

                    Goldwater campaigned on opposing civil rights as the first direct attempt to claim southern EC votes by mobilizing racists and other regressive groups. Whether or not he actually formerly believed in the racism he deliberately stoked is immaterial at that point.

                    Nor is the argument that individual senators and congressmen changed parties, it is that the Repub party deliberately focused on campaigns and policies that would result in racists voting for them. I’m not sure why you are misrepresenting that.

                    Southern Strategy and the deliberate decisions of the Repub party in decades following have inextricably linked the whole party with a core block of racist voters. Now even so-called “moderate” Repubs must accept the overt racism alongside whatever wedge issue they are voting for.

              • @barsquid
                link
                32 months ago

                I just don’t get what is in it for you to pretend he isn’t a racist. We all know he is a racist, that’s a fact, you can read all sorts of evidence. We all know the major reason for Trumpanzees to join the cult is racism, there is evidence for that also.

                Are you trying to fool yourself into believing that Republicanism isn’t about racism? Or is it some sort of trolling effort, like you think it makes people angry that you deliberately ignore objective reality? Seems childish either way.

                  • @barsquid
                    link
                    32 months ago

                    All you post are sources widely recognized as unreliable. Dinesh and Heritage, lol. And pretending that if Biden has made racist statements then Repubs must not be racist.

                    Repubs are catering to racists and have been for decades. Dogwhistling, stoking racial tensions, nakedly racist leadership like Donald. It is very obvious and overt. That’s what the majority of your fellow Repubs are voting for. Maybe you are voting primarily for different reasons, but you are a-okay with the blatant white supremacy.