• Flying Squid
    link
    192 months ago

    What would make insuring such homes profitable in your world?

    • @rottingleaf
      link
      -242 months ago

      An irrelevant question after your argument has been shot down

      • Flying Squid
        link
        192 months ago

        You didn’t shoot down my argument. You just said “nuh-uh.”

        • @rottingleaf
          link
          -192 months ago

          Your argument is in the wrong context -> it’s invalid -> shot down.

          You’re simply denying things you don’t like and pretend to be winning something somewhere. Go away

          • Flying Squid
            link
            172 months ago

            You said insurance would cover firefighting.

            I’m saying insurance can’t afford to do that now.

            Your response to that is “the ancap world isn’t like the world now.”

            Yes, I know. So what’s the difference?

            • @rottingleaf
              link
              -102 months ago

              A company may not be able to afford prolonging contracts without raising prices, but otherwise be able to fulfill this role.

              Maybe people shouldn’t settle in places too prone to fires.

              Maybe there’s some regulation involved in the first sentence which won’t be in ancap.

              Whatever. Ancap being worse than alternative in some criterion doesn’t mean defeat of ancap, ancap being better in some other criterion doesn’t mean victory of ancap.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                122 months ago

                Dude, you can’t solve the problem of fighting fires for everyone regardless of where they live or how much money they have, something we’ve already solved.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  72 months ago

                  And they’re already tripping on very basic shit… Wait until problems get trickier and subtler…

                  These guys are the flat-Earthers of politics. They cling onto some idiocy that’s defeated with arguments a 10 yo could make.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Evidently we can’t solve it either, at least not in CA.

                  Edit: [smacks forehead] you said fighting fires, not fire insurance, sorry