Samsung’s new Galaxy Z Fold 6 is a perfectly fine foldable, but from the brand that started the whole category, is that still enough?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    164 months ago

    I’m looking at the line up of foldables and wondering

    1. do I even really need one? I kinda want one, they look cool, but is it really that much better than a normal phone?

    2. should I even consider the Galaxy when the Honor V3 looks like it’s comparable specs with better battery and a thousand dollars cheaper?

    Tho the latter requires figuring it how to get and use one in the US.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      74 months ago

      generally speaking, id imagine youre a person why often watches content on a ipad mini/small ipad, its neat to have all the screen space in your pocket. if you arent that kind of user then there really isnt a purpose for it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 months ago

        But only if that viewing comes while you’re away from home. There is no reason to buy an expensive and fragile folding phone for video playback when you could buy almost any other phone and a secondhand tablet for less. Plus the tablet will have a bigger screen without a crease.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          but you have to carry 2x the items, which is the main thing. only one of the choices you can functionally do without a bag at all. You’re more or less making the DSLR argument where you could claim there’s no point on having good cameras on phones because you can carry a DSLR on you and take significantly better photos. Sometimes a choice is made for the ability to not carry something.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            34 months ago

            How can you type all this up without even reading the very first sentence of my comment?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              why bring up an argument for sole home use for an object that is more often used on the go? Especially in context of a tablet, when if you were at home and wanted a large form factor screen, the TV becomes an option.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                24 months ago

                Is this a joke question? Tablets have always been used at home. Do you have a TV in every single room of your house?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  it’s to give an example, some people may not have a tv all over their house, which to go into other rooms, they have other options. if it’s not a phone, it can potentially be other devices like a laptop and not just necessarily a tablet. The problem is using such a very specific usecase (someone who uses a tablet to watch things, ONLY at home, prefers to not use a TV, prefers to not use a desktop computer connected to a monitor and does NOT have a laptop, or chooses to not use the size of said laptop) is a very very super specfic usecase. Especially in a world now with WFM, the number of people with laptops is likely a lot higher too. The folding phone solves the problem as I stated before, those who choose to not want to carry something extra on the go, but get the extra screen real estate. At home use has to compete with several alternatives, and if you are considering using a tablet at home a lot, the novelty of a folding phone was never even in your market.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    24 months ago

                    The problem is using such a very specific usecase (someone who uses a tablet to watch things, ONLY at home, prefers to not use a TV, prefers to not use a desktop computer connected to a monitor and does NOT have a laptop, or chooses to not use the size of said laptop) is a very very super specfic usecase.

                    That’s not a niche use case. Tablets have been the primary media consumption device at home away from the TV for many years. That is literally what they have been marketed as for over a decade now. Very few people sit in bed and watch TV shows on their laptop, or go to a desktop computer to do the same. You are living in a bubble if you think this is normal behaviour for the majority of people.

                    The folding phone solves the problem

                    It doesn’t solve any problem with at-home media consumption because there is no problem. Most people already own a tablet or, as you just argued, a laptop. Even if they don’t, there is a massive secondhand market for tablets now. Why would you ever need to go out and spend thousands on a fragile folding device to fulfil this role? It sounds like you have massively fallen for the marketing here.

    • Hanrahan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 months ago

      Here in Australia the Honor V2 (older version, V3 just announced) is $200 less then the just announced Z Fold 6, then there are discounts and trade in to reduce the Fold 6’s RRP

      I don’t know how much the Honor V3 will be.

    • @CBRich
      link
      English
      54 months ago

      I have found my Fold most useful for work stuff. I can view and edit word and excel documents with plenty of space to see everything. I can do it anywhere when I have some free moments without lugging around another device. For casual stuff like Lemmy and web surfing it’s just really nice to read more with less scrolling.