@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 months agoviolently cries and sobslemmy.mlimagemessage-square222fedilinkarrow-up1552arrow-down1103
arrow-up1449arrow-down1imageviolently cries and sobslemmy.ml@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 months agomessage-square222fedilink
minus-squareKillingTimeItselflinkfedilinkEnglish0•2 months agowell it’s a demonym, which does exist. If you were talking about race, i would agree with you, because race literally does not exist.
minus-squareKillingTimeItselflinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoethnically would be some flavor of european, slav, asian, or south african/american and to some degree, american (considering the natives as american) like i said, that’s a demonym.
minus-square@MarciaLynnDorsettlink1•2 months agoyou’re wrong and condescending: not a good combination.
minus-squareKillingTimeItselflinkfedilinkEnglish0•2 months agodoesn’t take much googling to find out im not wrong. As for being condescending, i think i would just argue that i’m correct.
minus-squareKillingTimeItselflinkfedilinkEnglish0•2 months agowell, i mean your genetics would know. I’m not sure you would, unless you can read your own DNA.
how dare you tell me my ethnicity doesn’t exist.
well it’s a demonym, which does exist.
If you were talking about race, i would agree with you, because race literally does not exist.
ethnically I am a Pennsylvanian…wtf…
ethnically would be some flavor of european, slav, asian, or south african/american and to some degree, american (considering the natives as american)
like i said, that’s a demonym.
you’re wrong and condescending: not a good combination.
doesn’t take much googling to find out im not wrong. As for being condescending, i think i would just argue that i’m correct.
it’s my ethnicity. I would know
well, i mean your genetics would know. I’m not sure you would, unless you can read your own DNA.
ethnicity isn’t genetics