The cost of simply retrieving an answer from the Web is infinitely smaller than the cost of generating a new one.

Great interview with Sasha Luccioni from Huggingface on all the ways that using generative AI for everything is both a) hugely costly compared to existing methods, and b) insane.

  • BlackLaZoR
    link
    fedilink
    -274 months ago

    And yet, my opponents in discussion failed to provide good counterarguments. You aren’t going to convince me of anything by hating my post history

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      324 months ago

      And yet, my opponents in discussion

      good gods you’re going to be the most insufferable kind of person, aren’t you

      You aren’t going to convince me of anything

      this was a bit of a given

      bet you also think the climate cost of cryptocurrency is also a failing of the energy sector to deliver clean power to the innocent sweet little industrial-scale mining tycoons, don’t you

    • Steve
      link
      fedilink
      English
      244 months ago

      Nope it isn’t. You blame AI companies for pollution they didn’t generate. Blame the energy sector.

      don’t talk about providing good counterarguments, please

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        see, because they can’t provide their own, talking about good arguments is all they have left

        • Steve
          link
          fedilink
          English
          154 months ago

          I one-up your well-sourced article with a “nope it isn’t”, your move.

      • BlackLaZoR
        link
        fedilink
        -184 months ago

        What, you want to tell me I’m somehow obligated to exactly know where and how every service I use is produced?

        Talk about a horrible take.

        • flere-imsaho
          link
          fedilink
          English
          264 months ago

          it’s not “hating your post history”, it’s just realisation that you’re a shitty debatelord and talking to you is waste of time.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            it’s not “hating your post history”

            it has been [0] days since I got accused of having emotions about a driveby poster

            how rude

            (e: not that you did it ofc, flere, but ykwim)

          • BlackLaZoR
            link
            fedilink
            -164 months ago

            And yet you’re talking to me… To prove some point perhaps? Feel free to ignore or block me if you don’t like my posts.

            • flere-imsaho
              link
              fedilink
              114 months ago

              nie, ja tylko ostrzegam, że wylecisz stąd na kopach, misiu kolorowy. lepiej ci będzie na wykopie.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                134 months ago

                i wanted to know how did you know, then i looked up his comment history on kbin and i wish i didn’t (he extruded three more comments before he clocked that he’s banned)

                • flere-imsaho
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  124 months ago

                  a hunch, really: i’ve met the type and had my suspicions, and then i’ve found that he posted the link about polish antitrust & consumer protection watchdog fining paypal, which is generally niche outside poland.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    74 months ago

                    i’ve seen that too but the final giveaway was this fucking thing:

                    ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° )つ──☆*:・

                    from the last comment on awful (after ban)

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    34 months ago

                    btw i strongly suspect that there’s a way to tell native language of poster by style of writing and specific kinds of grammar mistakes

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                94 months ago

                misiu kolorowy

                huh, first time I run across this (although admittedly my polish is dangerously-seat-of-pants)

                • flere-imsaho
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  124 months ago

                  long, boring explanation follows

                  spoiler

                  there’s an informal mode of address that conveys the (one-sided, frequently) sense of familiarity, which goes [2nd person singular] [noun in vocative case] [adjective referring to the noun], like panie szanowny (lit. esteemed sir, but the inversion from the adj + noun to noun + adj signals different mode; so “szanowny panie” is formal, “panie szanowny” is shortening distance or expressing annoyance); it can be used, and frequently is, as a phrase that’s a personal affectation (e.g. “królu złoty!”, literally “golden majesty”). the affectation is usually rather annoying.

                  on the other hand “misiu” (vocative case of diminutive word for “bear” or “bear cub” or “teddy bear”) is a common word of endearment.

                  so “misiu kolorowy” is a bit of a wordplay on both, and should generally convey serious lack of respect and clear annoyance. (i’m guilty of using this from time to time since the times of polish usenet.)

                  there’s an added bonus in that there was a popular child series “miś colargol”, the pronunciation of “colargol” and “kolorowy” are pleasantly alliterative. (now this really shows my age….)


                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    94 months ago

                    that’s a much deeper (and thoroughly detailed) explanation than I expected, much thanks :)