• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -65 months ago

    It’s almost like “left” and “right” are bullshit alignments, and instead we have a wide array of stances on different issues; in this case on the tolerance of personal freedom and expression.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      145 months ago

      It’s almost like “left” and “right” are bullshit alignments

      Uh… No they’re not. They’re very useful words to refer to a range of ideologies and principles that, although not perfectly defining, make a lot of sense to use.

      and instead we have a wide array of stances on different issues

      That’s why there are subcategories in the left and the right.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      125 months ago

      Left and right can be useful, but it’s only a single data point. If you get all of your political beliefs from a single data point then you’re an idiot. As with everything, there is more nuance than that. It’s not useless. It just isn’t that encompassing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -25 months ago

        Isn’t it the opposite of a data point? Left and right are very broad categories, each of which includes a lot of data points

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 months ago

          Well, it’s (theoretically) the average position of every position they hold, which is one point. The issue is that everyone values different things in different ways, so it’s not the most useful thing.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -15 months ago

            I don’t agree that it’s an average as much as it’s a set containing many data points, but sure, just semantics I guess