• @return2ozmaOP
    link
    -142 months ago

    It’s still a good source for breaking news.

    • @Bernie_Sandals
      link
      132 months ago

      Is it really? In my experience you’re much more likely to find misinformation about breaking news than real breaking news itself on Twitter.

      • @return2ozmaOP
        link
        -42 months ago

        I make sure it’s from the reputable journalists.

        • @Bernie_Sandals
          link
          42 months ago

          I often find that people who say this are extremely bad at actually determining what a reputable journalist is.

          • @return2ozmaOP
            link
            12 months ago

            Mainstream journalists from NBC News, CNN, WaPo, etc.

            • @Bernie_Sandals
              link
              22 months ago

              Honest question, why not just use something like ground news then? It’s got all the same sites, gets past pay walls, and you don’t have to see random nazis and bot accounts, seems like a much better user experience.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate
      link
      English
      72 months ago

      I personally just refuse to give Musk the business or his site any more legitimacy. He’s proven repeatedly that we can’t trust him, as the article you posted is another case in point. The fact that the site has some utility isn’t why many of us question why people still use it.

    • @mycodesucks
      link
      3
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Why do people need that so desperately? Is it really so much of a burden to wait a few minutes for the platforms those journalists work for to vet and publish the news on their own platforms? Is your personal and immediate input and reaction so important? It’s important to be fast rather than correct!

      If these “trustworthy journalists” are posting information so quickly and spur of the moment that they aren’t checking things and ensuring their accuracy, they’re not as “trustworthy” as you think anyway.