• @TropicalDingdong
    link
    6
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The orchid you showed is not a vanilla. That is a staged shot with some other random orchid. The one I showed is from one of the many many Vanilla vines that I grow. They are not remotely the same.

    The flower in the logo is very clearly a Plumaria.

    Look if you dont know fuck about shit when it comes to flowers and plants, thats fine. But maybe don’t have an opinion then. However if you name your OS after a plant, and then proceed to butcher its presentation, you should be prepared for push back.

    • @hperrin
      link
      7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They named their OS after a genus of plants, not a single species. And there are some species that have wide, colored petals like that.

      https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vanilla_aphylla_from_Southern_Thailand.jpg

      But yeah, the logo is not a vanilla flower, but it’s not so drastically different I’d fault them for it.

      Edit 1: One thing to note is that they named their OS “Vanilla” because of the common description of a software product, meaning unaltered from its original release. They named it this because they don’t change any settings or add any extensions to the Gnome desktop. They provide a “vanilla” installation. I don’t actually know if they were trying to do a vanilla flower as their logo, or just a flower.

      Edit 2: They definitely were.

      The name “Vanilla OS” evokes the purity and simplicity we aim to offer our users, while the vanilla flower, featured in our logo, represents the sweetness and elegance of our operating system.

      (From their FAQ page.)

    • @hellofriend
      link
      42 months ago

      Who shat in your garden? Geez man, it’s just a logo.

        • @hellofriend
          link
          32 months ago

          Damn bro, why does the firefox logo look like a Finnish spitz