• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      84 months ago

      I have no intent to deceive. There’s a moral inconsistency amongst meat eaters. Pigs are okay, dogs are not. Why? “Oh, because we like dogs” Does that mean I can eat any sentient thing I dislike? “Well, no, dogs are intelligent!” Pigs are smarter than most breeds of dog, and have equal capabilities for emotion.

      There is no logical argument against veganism in western society. Literally none. Meat eaters collectively breed and kill literally billions of animals per year, destroying the planet, because it’s yummy. Meat eaters have essentially caused swine flu, bird flu, ebola, corona virus, just for the taste of meat. Meat eaters are causing treatment resistant bacteria by abusing antibiotics on high intensity farming, all for meat. That’s crazy.

              • KⒶMⒶLⒶ WⒶLZ 2Ⓐ24
                link
                -14 months ago

                If you mean that “gotchas” (your words, not mine) cannot ever be logically sound

                i mean gotchas are bad faith. they are loaded questions.

                  • KⒶMⒶLⒶ WⒶLZ 2Ⓐ24
                    link
                    04 months ago

                    sophistry is shitty. they had no interest in a genuine discussion or learning anything: they’re just trying to show how right they are, regardless of the facts

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  24 months ago

                  Hahaha just answer the question. You’re like that meme that goes “APPEAL TO AUTHORITY, STRAWMAN FALLACY” in the middle of a normal conversation. Likr, if you’re in a debate and someone pushes your argument into a corner, you can’t go “no, judged the opposing team is using gotcha arguments that make mine look foolish, I object”.

                  Gotcha!

                  • KⒶMⒶLⒶ WⒶLZ 2Ⓐ24
                    link
                    -24 months ago

                    I’m just trying to keep the conversation honest and point out rhetorical traps laid by dishonest interlocutors

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -54 months ago

        there is no logical argument for a lot of things, its just culture. and it is tasty and thats all that need be said.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          54 months ago

          There’s a lot of awful things in culture. It was culturally acceptable to slap a women on the bottom for a good job.

          Your argument is “ah well”.

          That’s not a reasonable defense for your objectively immoral actions. You are causing the suffering of sentient life for taste, that makes you immoral. Not to mention the horrible effect your diet has on the planet.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                14 months ago

                give me a valid offense against it there is nothing to defend because there is nothing wrong with it.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  14 months ago

                  Okay, I believe it is morally reprehensible to kill a sentient being - one that feels fear and does not want to die, solely for pleasure. Eating meat is immoral and in a just world, would be punishable.