• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    553 months ago

    Well that’s true. It’s just that anarchists prefer the centrist party over the openly fascist party, because we don’t want to live in a fourth reich.

    • @Clinicallydepressedpoochie
      link
      1
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’ve been told the true leftists would rather live under fascism dejure then compromise their morals by lending any support to the democrats.

        • @Clinicallydepressedpoochie
          link
          113 months ago

          Thank you for saying this. I’m so tired of them gaslighting every conversation pretending like they aren’t bottom feeders crawling out of the sewers every election cycle.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -93 months ago

      Anarchists prefer to not waste time by putting so much fucking energy into electoral politics. Vote, if you want (I’m not your Boss), but don’t spend sooo much time into electoralism.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        143 months ago

        It’s a small amount of energy to materially affect the environment in which you expend real energy on your praxis of choice. If you’re not enthusiastically voting at least lesser evil, you’re hamstringing your own praxis.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -13 months ago

              Look, I’m already gritting my teeth and doing what needs to be done to keep Trump out of office and now liberals want to loudly complain that I’m not enthusiastic enough about it. If anything short of enthusiastic support for another corporate dem will lead us into fascism, then it’s already fucking here.

              • @Cryophilia
                link
                23 months ago

                It literally is already fucking here and we need to stop it from getting more power. It has already taken over part of the government. You throwing up your hands and giving up is not helping this fight.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  03 months ago

                  Who said I was giving up? That’s what has me so frustrated. Expressing even the slightest criticism of Kamala has an army of liberals chastising me for contributing to voter apathy and telling me to be more enthusiastic. I’m not apathetic at all, I’m fired up, sick of this shit, and will never stop demanding more of the people who claim to be protecting us from the fascists. If the US falls to the christofascists it will be the dems’ - and all the liberals who uncritically support them - faults and not mine.

                  • @Cryophilia
                    link
                    13 months ago

                    Holy victim blaming. You really spent that whole paragraph describing shit things Republicans are doing and want to do, and then ended it by saying you’ll fight Democrats and if the shitty things happen you’ll blame democrats.

                    Dude, think about what you’re saying here.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  03 months ago

                  Sorry to release my frustrations entirely on you, you are but one voice in a cacophony. I only mean to point out how infuriating a response “please show more enthusiasm or the christofascists might win” is to criticism of the opposition candidate.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    13 months ago

                    Well, leftist apathy does make a christofascist win more likely. Criticizing the lesser evil right before an election does increase leftist apathy. Just because it’s infuriating doesn’t make it false.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -53 months ago

          I’m not talking about the act of voting itself. I’m talking about discussions, canvassing and campaigning for some lesser evil candidate.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                03 months ago

                I’m confused as to what other people do with their time and money has to do with you. Your statement was that anarchists don’t want to spend the energy engaging with electorialism, other people engaging with it to the point of canvassing and donations doesn’t force you to. All you have to do is vote, and recommend others vote if it comes up.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -13 months ago

                  I can be critical of what other people do. That’s like… the basics of systemic societal critique.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    13 months ago

                    Your criticisms are non sequiturs.

                    Your comment about anarchists and electorialism was a response to a comment saying anarchists prefer the center right party over the far right party. No one said anything about anarchists canvassing and fundraising for the center right party.

                    Your criticisms of canvassing and fundraising, while not entirely untrue, are absolutely irrelevant to to topic at hand. When you’re having a discussion, you keep your comments relevant to the topic of discussion. That’s like… the basics of conversation.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -13 months ago

        I’m going to be scrolling memes and shitposting either way because it’s how I relax. I think my fun should be socially conscious instead of only being about me. I should spend time doing good for others if it costs nothing.

    • Diva (she/her)
      link
      fedilink
      -143 months ago

      I don’t know a single anarchist that ‘prefer the quietly fascist party over the openly fascist party’ most of them prefer to DA the military contractors that are party to the latest american-supplied genocide.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        153 months ago

        Well, now you know one. Kamala is firmly against Netanyahu’s genocide, and I think after she’s no longer reliant on Joe for her campaign money and connections, she’ll be a bit more active about her opinions. She’s a good candidate. The DNC is moving in a good direction. It’s time to apply some positive reinforcement so they keep doing the good thing.

        • Diva (she/her)
          link
          fedilink
          -1
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Kamala is firmly against Netanyahu’s genocide

          The American supplied genocide which was the explicit policy of the Biden regime she was a part of. The administration that repeatedly bypassed congress to supply genocidal settlers with ammunition. Got it.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            83 months ago

            If I waited for a candidate who’s perfect before I got invested, they would never come because the politicians would realise anarchists aren’t invested and don’t vote. I’m supporting an imperfect candidate who is better than anyone else we’ve ever gotten, because I’m hoping next time they choose someone even better.

            If you won’t reward your dog for doing a little trick, how’s it going to learn to do a big one?

            • Diva (she/her)
              link
              fedilink
              -33 months ago

              If you won’t reward your dog for doing a little trick, how’s it going to learn to do a big one?

              The actual analogy here is that you’re rewarding your dog for not doing any tricks, and expecting me to be so impressed by your ability to train your dog that I also decide to feed them treats for doing nothing

              • @[email protected]OP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                4
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                For a dog who’s been trained for 50 years to support genocide, not supporting genocide is a pretty impressive trick. And Kamala doesn’t support genocide. Doing nothing deserves a reward.

                • Diva (she/her)
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -33 months ago

                  She’s literally second in command for the administration wringing its hands about the bodies piling up but continuing to send weapons and aircraft carriers to protect the colonial occupiers.

                  Was dick cheney not part of the bush admins crimes?

                  The one ‘anarchist’ who has managed to talk themselves into supporting american war criminals

                  • @Valmond
                    link
                    23 months ago

                    So this eventually boils down to : you’re an american, so you are complicit too.

                    Which is not how it works (except in religious fanatism).

                  • @[email protected]OP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -23 months ago

                    She’s not first in command. I’d volunteer to be guilty by association too if it meant I could stop the funding of genocide when the 80 year old kicks the bucket. Who knows, maybe she’s been slipping poison into his coffee. It’s what I’d do.