Coming from a district court, I think this ruling could be appealed, but it’s welcome news nevertheless.

  • @doingthestuff
    link
    291 month ago

    I believe it’s 100 miles from the border including coastlines but does not include a 100 mile radius around international airports. I don’t remember the source but Ive seen a map that represented it that way.

    Also worth noting, this ruling only benefits citizens in that specific district, as other districts aren’t bound by its rulings. Personally I’d recommend having a 2nd device you can use to record your interactions because if they violate your rights your chances of getting their body cam video of it aren’t great.

    • @skeezix
      link
      131 month ago

      What if you’re 99 miles and 5279 feet from the border while being questioned? Can you take one more step and be safe?

      And are those statute miles or nautical miles?

        • @aodhsishaj
          link
          21 month ago

          Evading arrest is likely the charge, however I’m being pedantic.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 month ago

            Sorry I meant hot pursuit would probably be the justification for why they’d be allowed to chase you outside their jurisdiction

            • @aodhsishaj
              link
              11 month ago

              Sure, like I said I was being pedantic.

      • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
        link
        21 month ago

        It would depend on where they initiated contact. For instance, let’s say a cop from City A pulls someone over on the boundary with City B. Even if you pull over on City B’s side, it’s still a valid stop because they initiated it (turned their lights on) while still within their own legal jurisdiction. Even though you’re outside of their jurisdiction at the moment, what matters is that they first initiated contact when it was legal to do so.

        • @skeezix
          link
          21 month ago

          Not according to Dukes of Hazzard logic.