I couldn’t care less about block chain, and this post had nothing to do with block chain. The reference is intended to mean like a signed chain of distributed keys or a distributed database. If you want an address, you also host a signed and locked down portion of the infrastructure. Like your node communicates with a wide area to keep your local IP up to date against your domain, where you then receive a signed portion of the database from someone like a distro package manager. Anyone can host their own domain in the system while the only cost is hosting a portion of the database and distributed DNS. It is not some money scheme. I’m saying the distributed chain of trust technology is present where it might be possible to create hosting “transactions” in such away that I can be issued a key while being a part of the key authority in a system that does not require a centralized authority or hosting.

I’m super naive about all the systems in place with web hosting and keys/certificates, but central authorities are a growing problem and such hacker based solutions would benefit everyone. I should be able to connect a Raspberry π, or better yet a RK3588 SBC, and one click install a basic secure web blog, or fediverse service from a menu of such services. The only cost should be my local basic ISP connection and a small portion of traffic in my neighborhood to give directions or check to make sure my neighbors are doing well. Any half intelligent kid should be able to do this.

Stop trying to inject blockchains into everything, fuck.

Lol way to get triggered by a single word in a well written, comprehensive response and have a tantrum.

I think it was meant crypyo as in cryptography Git uses it for signing (GPG), for example