• @coldy
    link
    English
    264 months ago

    The problem is that none of the countries you listed were ever socialist. Finland, Denmark, Sweden and Norway are just capitalist countries with good social policies.

    And as much as their propagandists wish they did, the USSR, Cuba and China never got past the state capitalism part of establishing socialism.

    There has never really been a socialist country in the world, it’s a bit of a moot point to go like “I like this kind of socialism but not this kind” when nobody ever got to see it…

    • @TankovayaDiviziya
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      That’s my point. Socialism developed a broad meaning as time went on. Before, it started to mean simply demanding better worker’s rights and conditions. But evolved to mean businesses owned by workers. Eventually, communism came into the scene and started to promote stateless society run by the proletariat. Then with so many people being turned off by the violence of communism, the more moderate left-- social democrats-- advocated to implement socialism through political and electoral mobilisation. But even then, as time progressed, social democrats abandoned their attempts to implement wholesale socialism and instead rein capitalism with sweeping regulations, instead of abolishing capitalism. Nonetheless, even though social democracy still embraced capitalism, the ideology is still considered under the wide tent of socialism but further right to it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        IIRC communism was the original Das Kapital version, and socialism came into being as “communism-lite” not really following Marx’s ideal but giving some good things to workers

        • @TankovayaDiviziya
          link
          English
          44 months ago

          The term socialism was first coined in 1832, way before Das Kapital has been published in 1866. But before Karl Marx, socialism as we know it wasn’t something that is fully solid despite the term already being coined. During 1848 liberal revolution, there were some who participated who’d be considered “socialists”, but they don’t necessarily know what they want.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 months ago

            That’s really cool! Thanks for the context I hadn’t known about that broader current of socialist thinking