• @Bernie_Sandals
    link
    English
    195 months ago

    Yes, because no population on this planet ever acts against their dictators without the U.S. forcing them to do so.

    • @wurzelgummidge
      link
      English
      -155 months ago

      Yes, because no population on this planet ever acts against their dictators without the U.S. funding them

      FTFY

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        165 months ago

        That explains the Chinese revolution, the Mexican revolution, hell the French revolution too :)

        • @wurzelgummidge
          link
          English
          -95 months ago

          It certainly helps to explain America’s long history of regime change and destabilisation initiatives

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            When your government botches an election in such a spectacular way, it is expected that the population would react in any country. I don’t know where you live, but if some protofascist steals an election e.g. Bolsonaro/Trump, we will both be out there rioting with good reason, it won’t be because the CIA paid us.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              105 months ago

              Or in other words: Potential protesters are not sitting at home like “Oh man, I so want to protest this shit, but the CIA didn’t pay me yet, so I can’t :(”

          • Flying SquidM
            link
            English
            75 months ago

            Sure. The Velvet Revolution.

            Or are you going to claim that Czechs and Slovaks have no self-determination? I’m sure some here will be willing to chime in and tell you otherwise.

      • @Bernie_Sandals
        link
        English
        75 months ago

        Plenty of revolutions have happened, before, during, and after the Cold War without U.S. support, the U.S. actively opposed the breakup of the Soviet Union for example, and yet it happened, and several democracies were created from it’s downfall, with little influence from the U.S.

        dictators without the U.S. funding them FTFY

        Even if the U.S. government did regularly fund protests/resistance against dictatorships, why would that be a bad thing? As long as it’s not singlehandedly deciding on regime change like in Iraq, I don’t see anything morally wrong with supporting pro-democracy causes within dictatorships.