• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I don’t trust their word and potentially inflated stats too much until the evidence is fully validated,

    but

    Maduro and the CNE’s ad-hoc caginess about the reports and local stats are much more revealing, given that they are the custodians of the election and should have an interest in transparency if Maduro had won.

    e.g. look at this bullshit

    This is a massive self-own, no CIA interference needed.

    • @SkyezOpen
      link
      English
      15 months ago

      The most obvious answer is that all of those candidates were labeled as “other” for the purpose of reporting and collectively got 4.6%, and the chart maker didn’t want to redesign it to accommodate for not knowing individual results.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        That would be fine if there were a detailed report of the results online or declared somewhere so people could check the results in each municipality. Instead, the https://www.cne.gob.ve/ is still down, I have no idea where to see where Maduro won and lost and by how much…all we have is that…which is clearly fucked.

        • @SkyezOpen
          link
          English
          -15 months ago

          It still doesn’t legitimize this as evidence. Focus instead on the disparity between polling and vote count. Looks like this was already widely debunked.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            polling can fail spectacularly. This is not about “evidence”, it is blatant obstruction by the official institutions that oversee the election, which is at least as bad. That is the only thing everyone is sure of at the moment.