Michigan’s policy of putting people on a sex-offender registry even if their crime was nonsexual is unconstitutional, the state Supreme Court said Monday.
In a 5-2 decision, the court said a portion of a 2021 law is “cruel or unusual punishment” barred by the Michigan Constitution.
A Wayne County man in 2015 was convicted of holding his wife and two children at gunpoint for hours. After his release from prison, he would face 15 years on the sex-offender registry because his unlawful-imprisonment conviction involved minors.
“Although defendant’s offense was undoubtedly severe, that offense contained no sexual element and no indication that defendant poses a risk of committing sexual crimes in the future,” Chief Justice Elizabeth Clement said.
There’s an interesting case study going on at the moment with that one Dutch Olympian convicted for a sex crime with a minor in the UK who has served his sentence (UK sentence got converted to a Dutch sentence, which meant he was released early). I’m not sure where I fall on this. Morally, I want to agree that serving your sentence means that this history shouldn’t play a role in otherwise unrelated matters. But somehow it also doesn’t feel right to have a convicted pedophile represent Olympic values?
Not really related to this, as these people were tossed on the sex offender registry without having committed a sex related crime.
But I understand your concern. Morally, the Olympics shouldn’t allow convicted pedophiles, but if you’re looking for morality and ethics at the Olympic committee level, you will find it decidedly lacking.