• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    24 months ago

    None of this refutes what was said above.

    Privatization resulted in alcohol prices increasing.

    I’ve also not seen any numbers that suggest that the Alberta government makes more revenue from the private system than they would have a public system.

    Every back-of-the-napkin calculation I’ve done suggests that the move to a private system increases access to alcohol for citizens while reducing the government revenue related to alcohol sales.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      Much of Europe is privatized and their prices are much less than here. The main reason our prices are so high is the special alcohol tax the government puts on to discourage drinking.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        To clarify your point. The privatization in Europe has nothing to do with the lower prices, it’s the lower tax rate.

        In places like Ontario we “double dip” on revenue where the LCBO marks up alcohol as any retailer would and makes revenue for Ontario, but at the same time, alcohol tax is also collected.

        When people talk about privatization of the LCBO, it’s a portion of that retail markup revenue which we would be unnecessary giving away.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      Yeah, I don’t see why tax collection would increase.

      The article mentions more selection, which is unambiguously good, and more locations which is good from a buyers perspective (although less so from a public health perspective). To be fair, it also mentions a lot of the jobs being minimum wage, but that seems like it has less to do with liquor and more to do with trends in the whole economy.

      I don’t know, it just doesn’t seem like something the private sector couldn’t do for any reason, so I’m unsurprised the sky didn’t fall, and the situation even improved in some respects.