Journalism and Analysis from an Anti-imperialist Perspective
Former U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence Officer and UN Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter reveals the unthinkable consequences of a particular move made by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. This will end Ukraine, and this video possesses the shocking details you need to know to understand where this conflict is going.
Scott Ritter: Ukraine’s Army on Brink of TOTAL COLLAPSE as Zelensky Begs for WWIII
#urkraine #nato #scottritter
Thanks for voicing your opinion on the matter!
Oh, feel free to ask questions on posts you think are missing context if you would like to learn more; maybe others would help you out or I might!
I encourage people that do not agree with my views to interact; it helps remove the chance of an echo chamber.
You could start by explaining to me why you think that Russia was not wrong in invading Ukraine, and why you are not willing to call out the Uighur genocide for what it is - ie, a genocide.
Quick thoughts from reading your reply:
Ukraine and Israel (to a degree) are pawns in a chess game, used to start more endless wars for profit as well as to get more natural resources from those lands.
My country has invaded a lot of foreign lands, including Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. We also have 700+ military bases outside of our own country.
NATO is not for defense; its only role is to help push for more wars with Russia and China.
Uighurs, I looked into the western talking points, and then I looked at independent journalists. I trust independent journalists much more than MSM and other owner-controlled media.
The only war I am for is the class war.
So Russia was right in invading Ukraine because it was pushed by NATO? Is their war justified because the USA also invaded foreign lands? Wouldn’t condemning the US for invading foreign land imply an equal condemnation of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine?
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1834&context=gsp