Huw Edwards, the BBC’s former top news presenter, pleaded guilty Wednesday to three counts of making indecent images of children.

The offences he pleaded guilty to at Westminster Magistrates’ Court in central London during a 26-minute hearing involved images shared on WhatsApp between December 2020 and August 2021.

Edwards has been remanded on bail until a sentencing hearing on Sept. 16. He could face up to 10 years in prison.

The court heard that Edwards, 62, was involved in an online chat with an adult man on the messaging service who sent him 377 sexual images, of which 41 were indecent images of children.

  • Media Bias Fact CheckerB
    link
    English
    -111 month ago
    CTV News Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

    CTV News is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

    Bias: Least Biased
    Factual Reporting: High
    Country: Canada
    Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ctv-news/

    Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


    Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
    Please consider supporting them by donating.

    Footer

    Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

    Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
    If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

      • @sensiblepuffin
        link
        English
        41 month ago

        You kinda have to shift everything they put slightly to the right - if AP is center-left, then I don’t know what to say anymore.

        • @sandbox
          link
          English
          21 month ago

          You just have to discard the entire thing. It’s just the opinion of a single zionist dude

          • @sensiblepuffin
            link
            English
            -11 month ago

            If that’s really your complaint, then if it’s not about Israel or Hamas, then I don’t see why we can’t use it.

            • @sandbox
              link
              English
              21 month ago

              You don’t see the issue with attaching the political opinion of a single, far- right, pro-zionist guy to every single news story posted?

              • @sensiblepuffin
                link
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Again, the only non-rambling concern I’ve seen about MBFC is that they are staunchly pro-Israel. What evidence do you have that they’re “far-right”? Calling AP center-left is a slight bias shift, but certainly not enough for me to call them far-right.

                • @sandbox
                  link
                  English
                  11 month ago

                  I’m assuming that you’re American? This is world news. Calling mainstream US media outlets anything approaching left-wing is absolutely farcical.

                  • @sensiblepuffin
                    link
                    English
                    11 month ago

                    What does it being world news have to do with it? My comment was that if MBFC marks the Associated Press, one of the most neutral news sources in the world alongside perhaps Reuters, as center-left, then naturally you should adjust all their judgments slightly to the right.