The disgraced R&B singer’s defence attorney, Jennifer Bonjean, has filed a petition to the Supreme Court, requesting to throw out his Chicago conviction for possession of child pornography and enticing minors to engage in sexual activity, claiming that the charges should be barred by the statute of limitations.

R. Kelly was already serving a 30-year sentence for sex trafficking, stemming from his 2021 New York case, at the time he was convicted of child pornography in Chicago for which he was sentenced to 20 years in 2023. He is also appealing the New York conviction, though that case is not part of the high court petition.

In the petition, Bonjean argues that the musician was wrongly retroactively prosecuted under a federal law – the PROTECT Act – which passed in 2003 and made the statute of limitations indefinite for sex crimes with minors.

    • @Burn_The_Right
      link
      52 months ago

      This is a tough one, though, because Clarence Thomas doesn’t like black people.

    • @Dorkyd68
      link
      42 months ago

      R Kelly is too broke from legal fees to afford “on clearance Thomas”. That mfer always on sale

      If Kelly can afford to buy him an rv or something maybe they can cut a deal