Looks like Taylan has made his decision: he intends to put ads on bg3.wiki

  • @symthetics
    link
    English
    91 month ago

    Just use an ad blocker? I’ve used that wiki loads and honestly can’t blame the guy for wanting to try and make a bit of money for his and other people’s time and effort.

    That said maybe patreon or something would have been a better idea.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 month ago

      I can.

      He mentions in the link that everything everyone added was explicitly licensed to not be commercial.

      • Kogasa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        Sure, but hosting the wiki itself has a cost.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 month ago

          Not a huge one.

          But more importantly, he thinks installing open source updates on a community project with community data constitutes a full time job. His guess is that it will generate “significantly higher” than 15k per month and he wants a big chunk of that.

    • Meldrik
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 month ago

      Wouldn’t pay as much.

      It sounds insane to me when he says maintaining a wiki for a video game, is a full-time job…

      • Pennomi
        link
        English
        -41 month ago

        Maintaining high quality content is harder than it sounds, especially for a topic as expansive as BG3.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 month ago

          It’s a wiki. With literally over 100 people who have done a large number of edits. He’s not doing anywhere near all the work of documenting the game.

          • Pennomi
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Curating a wiki is not as easy as you think. If anyone can edit the content, you have to be willing to open your site to all kinds of low-quality, off-topic, or counter factual edits. Reviewing the work of hundreds of users to maintain a consistent style and tone can absolutely be a full-time job.

            I don’t know if it’s the case here, of course. But there’s a whole lot of “curating isn’t REAL work” shaming going on in this thread.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              81 month ago

              It’s not anything in the neighborhood of a full time job. He absolutely does not deserve to make a living on it.

              And when those 100+ users contributed explicitly under a license dictating it not be for commercial use, he doesn’t deserve to earn a penny more than his expenses.

              • Pennomi
                link
                English
                41 month ago

                I strongly agree with the licensing issue. Noncommercial means noncommercial.