• @Emerald
    link
    English
    3
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    That’s not really a good take though. You don’t need to be intelligent or social to be worthy of the moral consideration to not be eaten. Otherwise we’d be eating babies.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      Yeah, that doesn’t logically follow. Nobody said it’s the one, singular consideration.

      You’re comparing a species of animal (whale) to the age of an animal (baby). Two completely different things…

      • @Hedin
        link
        English
        02 months ago

        deleted by creator

          • @Hedin
            link
            English
            12 months ago

            deleted by creator

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              No because you don’t understand that humans are animals, for one… But more importantly, because of the nature of your comments in this thread. It’s weird behavior.

              • @Hedin
                link
                English
                12 months ago

                deleted by creator

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  I didn’t say animals are human, i said humans are animals.

                  Can you really not grasp the distinction?

                  And oh yeah I know I’m weird lol