This is the first I’ve heard of it, but here’s one of his infamous quotes:

"There is a trait in the Jewish character that does provoke animosity, maybe it’s a kind of lack of generosity towards non-Jews.

I mean, there’s always a reason why anti-anything crops up anywhere; even a stinker like Hitler didn’t just pick on them for no reason.”

His other quotes tend to be condemnation about specifically Israeli zionism and barbaric murder, but i don’t have context as to whether he’s referring to palestine or not. Some people might have more sympathy for these statements these days, but a lot of his other quotes have to do with Jews controlling money and media, less defensible prejudice.

  • Nougat
    5•3 months ago

    Secular Jews would likely disagree with that.

      • Nougat
        5•3 months ago

        There’s plenty of non-religious people who identify as Jewish, yes.

        • @[email protected]English
          1•3 months ago

          There’s plenty of non-religious people who identify as Jewish, yes.

          right. but the question was: according to secular jews, “Jewish” = “race”?

            • @[email protected]English
              2•3 months ago

              you can convert to judaism and literally become jewish, even though you weren’t born into a jewish family. setting aside all the shit going on in politics right now, you cannot “decide” to become a different race

              • Nougat
                7•3 months ago

                “Jewish” can describe race, ethnicity, culture, nationality, religion, or any combination of the above, depending on who’s using the word and in what context.

                  • Nougat
                    4•3 months ago

                    Since you seem to be hung on semantics, perhaps a definition is in order:

                    Race is a categorization of humans based on shared physical or social qualities into groups generally viewed as distinct within a given society.[1] The term came into common usage during the 16th century, when it was used to refer to groups of various kinds, including those characterized by close kinship relations.[2] By the 17th century, the term began to refer to physical (phenotypical) traits, and then later to national affiliations. Modern science regards race as a social construct, an identity which is assigned based on rules made by society.[3][4][5] While partly based on physical similarities within groups, race does not have an inherent physical or biological meaning.[1][6][7] The concept of race is foundational to racism, the belief that humans can be divided based on the superiority of one race over another.

                    To the extent that “race” is even a real thing (I’m of the opinion that it’s not a useful or productive way to categorize people), many people do classify themselves and others using that terminology, for good or ill. It would generally be in the context of biological heritage (“bloodlines,” ew).

                    I wonder if @[email protected] would have something to add here.