• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    125 months ago

    It is only profitable for a few in some places. War is not net good for “business”

    • @jj4211
      link
      English
      65 months ago

      Ferrengi rule of acquisition 34. The best rule 34.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Sounds like the oligarch commandments.

        It’s like Hyperneoliberalism:

        “Nothing bad ever truly happens, guilt is subjective, nothing is real, everything is allowed, but if you take anything from me, it is the worst possible crime in all of history.”

    • @Coreidan
      link
      English
      55 months ago

      In a stagflation scenario war is great for business. Otherwise you have no business at all.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Isn’t WW2 the only example of this in practice? (and then only where the war did not reach, like the US or pre-1940 nazi germany)

        • @Coreidan
          link
          English
          75 months ago

          Ya it’s a pretty good example since WW2 was a stagflation scenario. It’s exactly the same scenario we are headed into. There’s a lot of similar polarities. Some may even argue that the next world war will break out precisely because of stagflation.

          As we descend further and further into economic depression (we’ve been in a recession for years) you’ll see the gears of war begin to spool up.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            One would think we’d have learned to fix this inevitability by now…or is it intentional, to “fix the stagflation”?

            • @CaptainSpaceman
              link
              English
              45 months ago

              The economy squeezes the proles for every penny they have, inflating the money faster than wages to ensure only the rich can afford to maintain.

              Once the proles have been squeezed dry, have a major conflict and help save the failing banks and restore a “golden era” for a time.

              Then do it all over again by starting to squeeze the masses.

            • HobbitFoot
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 months ago

              Part of the problem is getting everyone on board. Economic prosperity is a great way to justify keeping a government in charge. Major economic downturns usually cause a change of government and unrest with the government in general. Without a good economy as justification to keep a government in power, many governments turn to “defense” as a reason to stay in power.