• IndiBrony
    link
    English
    84 months ago

    The thing I hate about this is trying to understand what the better option is. At this point I’d be happy to see twitter banned in this country - we all know it’s full of hateful and violent rhetoric - but then you run the risk of all the assholes in that particular square getting out and further infecting other sites which aren’t as vitriolic.

    How do you go about conquering shit like this?

    • @then_three_more
      link
      16
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Eye watering fines for the company (say 25% of global turnover) and the ceo’s of said companies should be held personally liable and receive eye watering fines (25% of net worth). Would help plug the hole in the budget the Tories left too.

      • @manualoverride
        link
        64 months ago

        25% of turnover would be painful… 25% of profit and we’d have to pay them!

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          It should always be net, never gross, because these companies never make any profit. They exist as advertisers and platform pushes of whatever backer they currently have. Although in Musk’s case it exists mostly as an ego project now.

    • @steeznson
      link
      34 months ago

      I don’t like the idea of banning things but xitter is on thin ice. Not much more a reasonable govt can do after a certain point.

      In terms of actually resolving the underlying issues my opinion is that we need to fix stalled growth in the economy to address the tensions. It seems to me that the xenophobia is being fuelled by people feeling like the pie is getting smaller so more immigrants mean that their already small slice will get smaller. Mental health services and interventions need to get better too but that is also related to resources.