• @rishado
    link
    English
    44 months ago

    We all get what you’re saying dude. Doesn’t mean there isn’t a distinction. What you’re describing is an indirect effect on competitive integrity, which might be an arbitrary difference for viewers but for the IOC it’s a legitimate distinction.

    • @chemical_cutthroat
      link
      English
      -34 months ago

      Great! There is a distinction.

      I. Don’t. Care.

      Ban the pedos.

      I don’t get why this is an argument. Why are we even discussing this? I feel like it should be a given. Question 1 on your Olympic Entry Exam: Have you, as an adult, had sex with someone who did not or could not consent?

      You can put every other question about doping and ethics after that one, because if they get hung up on Question 1, they shouldn’t be allowed to represent their country on a national stage. There are others that can answer that question in the negative that can take up the spot for their country.

      It doesn’t matter what distinctions there are between doping and fucking kids, we need to, as a species, stop putting pedophiles on pedestals. Don’t buy their albums, don’t watch their movies, and don’t give them medals in the Olympics. They can work the fryer at McDonalds to support their wasted existence.

      • @rishado
        link
        English
        34 months ago

        No one was arguing with you from the beginning. We’re just saying there’s a distinction and the IOC probably views it like that.

      • @mojofrododojo
        link
        English
        14 months ago

        I will never understand the 8 downvotes you have. Ban the pedos shouldn’t be controversial.