• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -3
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Related announcement: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/privacy-preserving-attribution

    TLDR: Mozilla wants your data and it’s opt out. If you’re on FF 128 it’s already on and you will have to turn it off manually. Shame how they have fallen this low. The LEAST they could have done is show a pop up announcement when the user upgraded to 128.

    Also: +1 to Librewolf. Mozilla is definitely going to try more scummy crap like this in the future. Definitely the better option over Firefox.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      373 months ago

      Maybe I’m misunderstanding, but I just read that whole article and it sounds like a good implementation? Companies want to know how effective their ads are, and I like their approach of trying to find a way to provide this without wholesale personal data collection. They even say at the end that they don’t get the data either. It sounds like a reasonable thing to try and standardize.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        113 months ago

        I’m not commenting on implementation itself but rather on how Mozilla went about with an opt-out approach into the collection program (even if it was for testing) to a community they have cultivated with the promise of privacy.

        Collecting my data is a big deal. It doesn’t matter how it is used. I should at least consent to it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          I feel like this argument is fair enough. I think a pop-up informing the user about it and how to opt out is sufficient.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          So long as it survives rusts complexity and lack of portability. I’m always down for more options!

          • a Kendrick fan
            link
            fedilink
            23 months ago

            rust is complex and non-portable?

            i’ve never heard of this, do you mind explaining what you mean better?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 months ago

              You joking? 😆 I don’t want to discourage you from giving rust a try but come on. Have you ever talked to a developer that spent any real time with rust, anyone that got as far as multi threading?

        • Zorro
          link
          English
          13 months ago

          Wasn’t Firefox supposed to incorporate Servo in some way or another before Quantum was developed?

          • a Kendrick fan
            link
            fedilink
            23 months ago

            I think the Quantum release was what integrated some major components of the servo project.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          Looks really cool. I hope we don’t have the overreliance on one rendering engine in the future. Once one or the other comes out I’ll definitely try it out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      33 months ago

      I’ve read the announcement. Sounds reasonable and sufficiently private to me. So saying “Mozilla wants your data” sounds misleading and like an overreaction to me. Also might help to mitigate the arms race in privacy protection versus tracking for ads and worse stuff.

      Mozilla is definitely going to try more scummy crap like this in the future.

      How do you know that?

      Even if, there will still be alternatives. But right now, Firefox is the best browser with regards to privacy and security. It even passed minmum ratings by the german IT security authority, contrary to other widely used browsers.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          I’m with you on the opt-out vs. opt-in part. That’s not a nice move. Regardless of that, Firefox is still the best choice. I hope they will continue to improve.