• @d00ery
    link
    1
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    We’re talking about food production.

    I misunderstood you. Have more people doing farm work, that way we have enough food and individual farmers don’t have to work so hard

    • Flying SquidM
      link
      -11 month ago

      But what if you can’t find enough people to do farm work? A lot of people work on farms now because they don’t have much of a choice. And if you could do easier work but be paid the same as you would on a farm, why not take advantage of that?

      • @d00ery
        link
        1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        We already have people working lots of hours doing jobs they might not want to do.

        The question was could we reduce the number of hours people work and still have enough food

        • Flying SquidM
          link
          -11 month ago

          I thought everyone was also going to be paid equally.

          • @d00ery
            link
            11 month ago

            I didn’t even mention pay

            • Flying SquidM
              link
              -11 month ago

              The comment chain before you entered into it:

              With modern farming, 10% of the people can now produce enough food for everyone. And if everyone had equal income instead of the top 1% syphoning off half the wealth, we could globally support a middle class lifestyle by everyone working 20 hours a week, the same amount that hunters and gatherers “worked”.

              https://lemmy.world/comment/11628981

              So equal pay was already part of the discussion before you joined it.

              • @d00ery
                link
                21 month ago

                We chase money because this equates to goods and services. Well there’s a huge excess of money being produced and horded.

                This excess production is a result of … work (plus machinery, efficiency improvements etc).

                So if we reduced the numbers of hours worked we’d reduce this excess.