I think what many people, both those calling for war and those condemning it, don’t take into account is that a war against non-conventional forces in an urban area has never been fought without massive civilian casualties. I have read that in the battle of Mosul, about 10,000 ISIS fighters and 8,000 civilians were killed. This horrifying number of civilian casualties is actually unusual in that it is smaller than the number of enemy fighters killed. It’s about the best that any army in the world could have done in those circumstances. For reference, the Russian army during the siege of Mariupol killed approximately 8 civilians for each Ukrainian soldier, despite the fact that those Ukrainian soldiers were in uniform and did not deliberately hide among civilians.
For reference, the Russian army during the siege of Mariupol killed approximately 8 civilians for each Ukrainian soldier, despite the fact that those Ukrainian soldiers were in uniform and did not deliberately hide among civilians.
Are you seriously trying to compare Russia with the US? Like congratulations, your My Lai past is fully behind you.
Who else is there to compare to? There haven’t been a lot of counties doing that sort of fighting recently other than Russia, the US-led coalition, and now Israel. We don’t have the numbers for Israel yet but my guess is that they’ll be in the range of 2 to 3 civilians per combatant, leaving the USA as the best and Russia as the worst by far. With that said, direct comparisons are a very oversimplified way of looking at this because, for example, Hamas in Gaza is better armed and more heavily fortified than ISIS in Mosul was.
As for My Lai: massacres like that attract the most public attention but they account for a very small fraction of civilian casualties. Most civilians are killed by routine bombings and artillery bombardments, not by infantry going on a killing spree against orders.
Well, not exactly.
I think what many people, both those calling for war and those condemning it, don’t take into account is that a war against non-conventional forces in an urban area has never been fought without massive civilian casualties. I have read that in the battle of Mosul, about 10,000 ISIS fighters and 8,000 civilians were killed. This horrifying number of civilian casualties is actually unusual in that it is smaller than the number of enemy fighters killed. It’s about the best that any army in the world could have done in those circumstances. For reference, the Russian army during the siege of Mariupol killed approximately 8 civilians for each Ukrainian soldier, despite the fact that those Ukrainian soldiers were in uniform and did not deliberately hide among civilians.
Are you seriously trying to compare Russia with the US? Like congratulations, your My Lai past is fully behind you.
Who else is there to compare to? There haven’t been a lot of counties doing that sort of fighting recently other than Russia, the US-led coalition, and now Israel. We don’t have the numbers for Israel yet but my guess is that they’ll be in the range of 2 to 3 civilians per combatant, leaving the USA as the best and Russia as the worst by far. With that said, direct comparisons are a very oversimplified way of looking at this because, for example, Hamas in Gaza is better armed and more heavily fortified than ISIS in Mosul was.
As for My Lai: massacres like that attract the most public attention but they account for a very small fraction of civilian casualties. Most civilians are killed by routine bombings and artillery bombardments, not by infantry going on a killing spree against orders.