Reactionary: (of a person or a set of views) opposing political or social liberalization or reform.
I love it when reactionaries can’t even define their own political philosophy (or any political philosophy for that matter).
Please, tell me how this statement is advocating for a return to a rose-colored past when minorities had fewer rights. Especially since Walz is a proven progressive. How does your accusation make any sense at all?
Jesus fucking christ. The only argument conservatives have is “no u.” It’d be hilarious if it wasn’t so sad. Every day is opposite day in Conservatopia!
Well that certainly trumps the two books I’ve read on reactionary politics.
Guess your one little sentence fragment is so much more powerful than decades of research (if you ignore the second half of it).
Damn. You really got me. Let’s look at some definitions to see:
Here are aggregated definitions of “reactionary” from ten sources:
Merriam-Webster: Defines reactionary as someone or something that favors reaction, particularly extreme conservatism or rightism in politics, opposing political or social change [❞].
Wikipedia: A reactionary favors a return to a previous state of society, believing it possessed positive characteristics absent from contemporary society. Reactionaries oppose social transformation and are often seen as part of right-wing politics [❞].
Dictionary.com: Describes a reactionary as one who favors reaction, particularly extreme conservatism or opposition to political or social change [❞].
Vocabulary.com: Defines a reactionary as an extremely conservative person who opposes progress or liberalism, often aligning with far-right or ultraconservative views [❞].
The Free Dictionary: Characterizes reactionary as extremely conservative and opposed to progress or liberalism, emphasizing a strong traditionalist perspective [❞].
Collins English Dictionary: Describes a reactionary as someone who opposes radical political or social change, often related to ultraconservative views [❞].
YourDictionary: Defines reactionary as characterized by opposition to progress or liberalism, highlighting an extremely conservative stance [❞].
Britannica Dictionary: Defines a reactionary as a person strongly opposed to new political or social ideas, typically disapproving of progressive changes [❞].
Wiktionary: A reactionary is described as someone who opposes revolution and favors a return to a past state, often associated with traditionalist conservative views [❞].
Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries: Defines a reactionary as an individual opposed to radical political or social change, often synonymous with extreme conservatism [❞].
Hmmmmmmmmm… There’s something I can’t quite put my finger on…
@LookBehindYouNowAndThen @Amoxtli That’s literally a reactionary position 😂
I love it when reactionaries can’t even define their own political philosophy (or any political philosophy for that matter).
Please, tell me how this statement is advocating for a return to a rose-colored past when minorities had fewer rights. Especially since Walz is a proven progressive. How does your accusation make any sense at all?
Jesus fucking christ. The only argument conservatives have is “no u.” It’d be hilarious if it wasn’t so sad. Every day is opposite day in Conservatopia!
@LookBehindYouNowAndThen I wonder where you got that definition from. #MiriamWebster says:
> relating to, marked by, or favoring reaction; especially ultraconservative in politics
https://web.archive.org/web/20140104035502/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reactionary
Oh that’s so much better!
My saying a progressive is a good candidate sure is ultraconservative!
What a smart rebuttal; I’m truly humbled.
@LookBehindYouNowAndThen Feel free to read the definition again and come back with a different response.
Feel free to read a book.
@LookBehindYouNowAndThen I literally am citing #MiriamWebster 😂
I must say, I am a bit surprised. Do dictionary definitions usually trip you up like this?
Well that certainly trumps the two books I’ve read on reactionary politics.
Guess your one little sentence fragment is so much more powerful than decades of research (if you ignore the second half of it).
Damn. You really got me. Let’s look at some definitions to see:
Here are aggregated definitions of “reactionary” from ten sources:
Merriam-Webster: Defines reactionary as someone or something that favors reaction, particularly extreme conservatism or rightism in politics, opposing political or social change [❞].
Wikipedia: A reactionary favors a return to a previous state of society, believing it possessed positive characteristics absent from contemporary society. Reactionaries oppose social transformation and are often seen as part of right-wing politics [❞].
Dictionary.com: Describes a reactionary as one who favors reaction, particularly extreme conservatism or opposition to political or social change [❞].
Vocabulary.com: Defines a reactionary as an extremely conservative person who opposes progress or liberalism, often aligning with far-right or ultraconservative views [❞].
The Free Dictionary: Characterizes reactionary as extremely conservative and opposed to progress or liberalism, emphasizing a strong traditionalist perspective [❞].
Collins English Dictionary: Describes a reactionary as someone who opposes radical political or social change, often related to ultraconservative views [❞].
YourDictionary: Defines reactionary as characterized by opposition to progress or liberalism, highlighting an extremely conservative stance [❞].
Britannica Dictionary: Defines a reactionary as a person strongly opposed to new political or social ideas, typically disapproving of progressive changes [❞].
Wiktionary: A reactionary is described as someone who opposes revolution and favors a return to a past state, often associated with traditionalist conservative views [❞].
Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries: Defines a reactionary as an individual opposed to radical political or social change, often synonymous with extreme conservatism [❞].
Hmmmmmmmmm… There’s something I can’t quite put my finger on…
Exactly how many decades did it take you to read those two books?