@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 7 months agoTechnically Correctmander.xyzimagemessage-square181fedilinkarrow-up11.57Karrow-down121
arrow-up11.55Karrow-down1imageTechnically Correctmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 7 months agomessage-square181fedilink
minus-squareZiglin (they/them)linkEnglish5•7 months agoThe mollecular structure isn’t the only thing relevant for bombs. You could make a bomb out of a pressurized material that you can quickly get to expand, I think that technically isn’t an explosive. I get your point but I also think having a catch all is good to prevent things that could otherwise get through by technicality.
The mollecular structure isn’t the only thing relevant for bombs.
You could make a bomb out of a pressurized material that you can quickly get to expand, I think that technically isn’t an explosive.
I get your point but I also think having a catch all is good to prevent things that could otherwise get through by technicality.