mozz to Data Is [email protected] • edit-24 months agoPresidential election popular vote tallies lined up against “did not vote”mbin.grits.devimagemessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up1485arrow-down121
arrow-up1464arrow-down1imagePresidential election popular vote tallies lined up against “did not vote”mbin.grits.devmozz to Data Is [email protected] • edit-24 months agomessage-square117fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink32•4 months agoThe percentages for 2016 only add up to 97, and the 40% bar is longer than the 41% of 2012.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink19•edit-24 months agoMaybe 3% voted for a third party, and because they aren’t shown the other bars were expanded to fill the entire space
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink10•4 months agoThey could’ve done a little green sliver like they did for 1980.
minus-square@Mojavelink3•4 months agoLooks like '95 has 5% third party votes. The lower bound for visually representing votes here may be somewhere between 5% and 3% for the purposes of this graphic
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•4 months agoJust like the sub on reddit, the data in DataIsBeautiful apparently doesn’t actually have to be beautiful.
The percentages for 2016 only add up to 97, and the 40% bar is longer than the 41% of 2012.
Maybe 3% voted for a third party, and because they aren’t shown the other bars were expanded to fill the entire space
They could’ve done a little green sliver like they did for 1980.
Looks like '95 has 5% third party votes. The lower bound for visually representing votes here may be somewhere between 5% and 3% for the purposes of this graphic
Just like the sub on reddit, the data in DataIsBeautiful apparently doesn’t actually have to be beautiful.