Dire financial straits are leading droves of Olympic athletes to sell images of their bodies to subscribers on OnlyFans — known for sexually explicit content — to sustain their dreams of gold at the Games.

Dire financial straits are leading droves of Olympic athletes to sell images of their bodies to subscribers on OnlyFans — known for sexually explicit content — to sustain their dreams of gold at the Games. As they struggle to make ends meet, a spotlight is being cast on an Olympics funding system that watchdog groups condemn as “broken,” claiming most athletes “can barely pay their rent.”

The Olympics, the world’s biggest sporting stage, bring in billions of dollars in TV rights, ticket sales and sponsorship, but most athletes must fend for themselves financially.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) did not express concern about the situation. When asked by The Associated Press about athletes turning to OnlyFans, IOC spokesman Mark Adams said, “I would assume that athletes, like all citizens, are allowed to do what they can.”

Watching his sponsorships dry up and facing mounting costs, Jack Laugher was among the pantheon of Olympic athletes using the often-controversial platform to get to the Games — or simply survive.

    • Flying Squid
      12•4 months ago

      They should be funded by the IOC. Right now, they’re being paid by their country (if they want to have a chance of medaling).

      They also rarely train inside that country or with a trainer from that country. Many of them go to the U.S. for training and stay there for years.

        • Flying Squid
          10•4 months ago

          From the article:

          The Olympics, the world’s biggest sporting stage, bring in billions of dollars in TV rights, ticket sales and sponsorship, but most athletes must fend for themselves financially.

          • @[email protected]
            0•4 months ago

            Ok, so the IOC should be taking that revenue away from the host country and expect them to pay for the infrastructure and staff at an even bigger loss?

            Which country or city would want to do that?

            • Flying Squid
              4•4 months ago

              It doesn’t say the host country is the one that makes the money. And I’m sure they can spare a billion or two for the athletes.

              • @[email protected]
                -1•4 months ago

                What doesn’t say the host country is the one that makes the money?

                The Olympics is already operating at a net loss, with the host city/country basically footing the bill in exchange for publicity.

                Do you think these cities would be happy to pay for 20.000 extra ‘employees’ for four years?