An important question this article ignores, is why private school vouchers are chosen over public schools?

  • NeuromancerM
    link
    fedilink
    -61 month ago

    The only way I see them working is they are limited and possibly income based.

    Meaning if the voucher is worth 10k. You can only spend 10k. You can pay more. That’ll encourage schools to keep their prices down. If someone wants to send their kids to an 11k school they have to pay the whole 11k.

    I don’t know the right dollar amount but there should be a cap. Right parents are often sending their kids to private schools anyway. The goal of vouchers is to push bottom scoring schools to do better or another way is you only get vouchers if you school is scoring in a certain category.

    The school I attended was one of the top in the nation. My family was poor but hypothetically we shouldn’t be offered vouchers due to the quality of education provided.

    I see inner cities getting the most benefit but rural America will still struggle. That’s a tough nut to crack since the population density is low.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart
      link
      71 month ago

      I see inner cities getting the most benefit but rural America will still struggle. That’s a tough nut to crack since the population density is low.

      That amusingly enough is also a reason why public schools cost more than private schools.

      • NeuromancerM
        link
        fedilink
        -51 month ago

        Rural tends to spend less per student. Schools are funded by local taxes for the majority of the expenditures. When most your population is below poverty level income, you just don’t want the tax base. You also can’t get private schools to compete for the 10 kids in the class. So that’s one scenario I don’t know what the right answer is.

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart
          link
          51 month ago

          But even though you don’t know the answer you’re okay with defunding the current solution because you don’t agree with it?

          • NeuromancerM
            link
            fedilink
            -61 month ago

            Since they’d still have public school, their situation would stay the same but it would improve the education of millions of poor minority children.

            I think that’s a good thing.

            • SatansMaggotyCumFart
              link
              51 month ago

              But every parent that you supply with vouchers takes money out of the public system until it collapses.

              • NeuromancerM
                link
                fedilink
                -61 month ago

                Or it improves. It’s their choice. Right now public schools have a monopoly and vouchers break that monopoly. They can either improve or fail.

                Either way the children benefit with a better education and that is what is important.

                • SatansMaggotyCumFart
                  link
                  61 month ago

                  You don’t play the sink or swim game when an entire generation of kid’s education is on the line.

                  • @LookBehindYouNowAndThen
                    link
                    21 month ago

                    It’s so funny how the user people always see as a troll just wipes the floor with these reactionaries.

                    You love to see it.

                  • NeuromancerM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -41 month ago

                    We’ve already done in to inner city kids since the 1970’s.

                    I am a big advocate the education is the way to solve income disparity. The solution isn’t wealth distraction. It’s making sure every child has a quality education.

                    Also when you first start there will be a limit to capacity. The private schools around today would be the ones children could attend. It’s take awhile to get a school up and certified. Overnight there would be little change and over years it’d make a positive outcome.