• @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
    link
    English
    -181 month ago

    Imagine a corrupt state really wants gold. Why wouldn’t they register a whole batch of males as female (or duplicate register as both sexes) wait 20 years then clean up the women’s events?

    • @problematicPanther
      link
      English
      111 month ago

      so, the heart of your argument itself is sexist. Your argument is, basically, that a man is better than a woman at sports, just because he’s a man. Athletes at this level are insanely talented and fit. Some are even genetic anomalies, which explain why they can be so good at their sport. Simone biles is really small, which is why she’s so good at flipping.

      A female boxer at this level would decimate a male boxer who isn’t genetically selected for and who hasn’t trained his whole life to get to that level. Being male doesn’t make one good at sports.

      On the scale youre talking about, the government would be complicit in widescale corruption to rig a single event in an event where there’s no money involved for the winner, requiring several hundred people to be the athletes who might be good enough to go to the event, boatloads of money to train them, and even then, they might get one through the event if the athlete isn’t injured. All for what reward? A single relatively worthless gold medal?

      • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
        link
        English
        -9
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Your argument is, basically, that a man is better than a woman at sports, just because he’s a man.

        No. Women should always have the option to compete against men, (and prove they are better), if they chose to. But just look at world records if you need concrete proof that males have an advantage.

        Many sports there is no physical advantage and some (e.g. climbing) women have the advantage.

        On the scale youre talking about, the government would be complicit in widescale corruption to rig a single event in an event where there’s no money involved for the winner,

        Not a single event, this could be done for multiple events, even without the athlete’s knowledge. For the first decade only a few record keepers need to be in the conspiracy.

        All for what reward? A single relatively worthless gold medal?

        Why? You should ask cold war Russia.

        • Flying SquidM
          link
          English
          51 month ago

          What exactly do you think the Soviet Union achieved by winning a bunch of medals?

          • @TheFonz
            link
            English
            4
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The person you are responding seems uninformed on the topic of Imane and in spreading misinform.

            However, Russia does have a sordid history messing with international sports. Look up all the scandals in figure skating and also last year Olympics. I’m not sure why they do it. I think it has to do with projecting power on the world stage.

              • @problematicPanther
                link
                English
                11 month ago

                No you aren’t. You’re arguing about trans women athletes competing in the Olympics against cis women in a thread specifically about Imane.

                • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
                  link
                  English
                  -11 month ago

                  I’m arguing about the classification rules of the Olympic committee because the current rules are not sufficiently clear and have caused needless distress to at least two gold medal winners.

                  • @problematicPanther
                    link
                    English
                    21 month ago

                    No, the rules are very clear. It’s just right wing nutcases making up shit just to stir up trouble. The rules are there, and they’ve been in place long before this particular Olympic event.

          • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
            link
            English
            01 month ago
            • Propaganda and ideological superiority of communism.

            • Cold war rivalry. Proxy battle.

            • National pride and unity.

            • International prestige.

            • Flying SquidM
              link
              English
              21 month ago

              So nothing important then.

              Yes, you’ve definitely come up with a plausible reason why a Muslim country would be okay with a transgender athlete. Algeria is just desperate for international prestige. It will definitely do something or other.

              • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
                link
                English
                01 month ago

                Yes, you’ve definitely come up with a plausible reason why a Muslim country would be okay with a transgender athlete.

                Have I? Strange. I wasn’t asked that question.

                • Flying SquidM
                  link
                  English
                  11 month ago

                  I love how your whole conversation here is like “I’m not saying Khelif isn’t a woman and shouldn’t compete, but someone who is a person who boxes women that I have not named, but have decided is not a woman, should not compete with women. But I’m not saying it’s Khelif.”

                  • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
                    link
                    English
                    01 month ago

                    My point is to reduce future similar incidents. Not discuss any specific case. As it is, this discussion is doomed to be repeated.

    • Flying SquidM
      link
      English
      91 month ago

      What do you think they would achieve in any practical way by winning a bunch of gold medals?

      It’s the Olympics, not trade negotiations.

      • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
        link
        English
        -11 month ago

        It’s estimated that the value of a gold medal is around $1 million in terms of economic impact, considering factors like increased tourism, sponsorship, and national pride.

        • Flying SquidM
          link
          English
          21 month ago

          Please do provide actual evidence for that claim. Specifically for a gold medal in women’s boxing.

          • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
            link
            English
            -21 month ago

            I found that statistic on Bing. You can too.

            I’m not specifically discussing women’s boxing.

            • Flying SquidM
              link
              English
              11 month ago

              Yes, you can find all kinds of fake statistics on Bing. That’s how the internet works. Let’s see the source of yours.

        • Todd Bonzalez
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That’s a pathetically tiny amount of capital for a state.

          • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
            link
            English
            -11 month ago

            You are asking about the total benefits of sending athletes to the Olympics, not the statistical weighing of gold medals in a regression model.

    • Todd Bonzalez
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      What the the absolute fuck are you talking about? This is some deranged paranoid nonsense.