seahorse [Ohio]@midwest.socialM to Antifascism@midwest.socialEnglish · 8 months agoArmed nazis in Springfield, Ohiomidwest.socialexternal-linkmessage-square212fedilinkarrow-up1711arrow-down111file-text
arrow-up1700arrow-down1external-linkArmed nazis in Springfield, Ohiomidwest.socialseahorse [Ohio]@midwest.socialM to Antifascism@midwest.socialEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square212fedilinkfile-text
Found on reddit. I’m told the reason for their visit is to intimidate the Haitian immigrant community there.
minus-squarenick@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up50arrow-down4·8 months agoThe only good Nazi is a dead Nazi. Nazi lives don’t matter.
minus-squareZachariahlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down29·8 months agoKill their ideas, save the humans.
minus-squarerocketpoweredredneck@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down2·8 months agoif theres anything human left of them. I know you said we shouldnt dehumanize them, but these people have done that to themselves.
minus-squareZachariahlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down18·8 months agoThat still doesn’t justify murder for what is in the photo.
minus-squareCypherlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·8 months agoArmed Nazis are valid military targets. They should be eliminated immediately with a focus on avoiding collateral damage.
minus-squareZachariahlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·8 months agoIn this case (Americans on American soil), wouldn’t capture be preferred? We do that with enemy combatants all the time. If elimination is better, why?
minus-squareCypherlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·8 months agoIncarceration costs a lot and bullets are cheap.
minus-squareZachariahlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·8 months agoAre those the only criteria for this being the better choice?
minus-squareInternetUser2012@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down5·8 months agoThey’re no longer humans.
minus-squareZachariahlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down15·8 months agoPlease explain how I am supposed to tell the difference between you (suggesting murder) and them (implying murder). Or if you’re a right-wing violence-obsessed troll, fuck off with the nazis.
minus-squaresnooggums@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down1·8 months agoOne is based on overt flag waving, genocide loving, pure ideologynof hatred being paraded in the streets as a direct threat to other citizens. The other is self defense against that threat. Seems like an obvious distinction to me.
minus-squareZachariahlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down14·edit-28 months agoHow is killing (rather than stopping) these specific people self-defense? You talk like a cop. Shut their shit down. Just maybe don’t jump immediately to violence.
minus-squarenick@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·8 months agoYou’re on the wrong side here.
minus-squareTheTetrapodlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·8 months agoNo, you’re just being a “both sides bad” style centrist, so the proper move is to ignore your terrible opinion.
minus-squarenick@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down2·8 months agoThat’s not how it works.
The only good Nazi is a dead Nazi. Nazi lives don’t matter.
Kill their ideas, save the humans.
if theres anything human left of them. I know you said we shouldnt dehumanize them, but these people have done that to themselves.
That still doesn’t justify murder for what is in the photo.
Armed Nazis are valid military targets.
They should be eliminated immediately with a focus on avoiding collateral damage.
In this case (Americans on American soil), wouldn’t capture be preferred? We do that with enemy combatants all the time. If elimination is better, why?
Incarceration costs a lot and bullets are cheap.
Are those the only criteria for this being the better choice?
They’re no longer humans.
Please explain how I am supposed to tell the difference between you (suggesting murder) and them (implying murder).
Or if you’re a right-wing violence-obsessed troll, fuck off with the nazis.
One is based on overt flag waving, genocide loving, pure ideologynof hatred being paraded in the streets as a direct threat to other citizens.
The other is self defense against that threat.
Seems like an obvious distinction to me.
How is killing (rather than stopping) these specific people self-defense?
You talk like a cop.
Shut their shit down. Just maybe don’t jump immediately to violence.
You’re on the wrong side here.
Okay. Kill me, too?
No, you’re just being a “both sides bad” style centrist, so the proper move is to ignore your terrible opinion.
That’s not how it works.
Okay.
No.