• @Buddahriffic
    link
    English
    41 month ago

    Though another question would be is that 70% of everyone or were some people automatically not included in the count, like slaves?

    Not that I expect worse literacy rates in urban slaves, but just another thing to consider. If anything, I’d guess they might have been even higher for slaves because IIRC urban slaves had more administrative and tutoring type jobs, in contrast from the mining and agricultural jobs outside of cities that might have looked more like the slavery we picture today when we hear that word.

    • @PugJesusOPM
      link
      English
      51 month ago

      It’s already a very difficult thing to estimate at all, but I think it’s meant as 70% of the entire town’s population. There’s evidence for literacy amongst slaves, low-class prostitutes, and manual laborers in Pompeii, so while slaves were probably less likely than, say, male citizens to be literate, I think averaged out by the rest of the population it’s supposed to be around there.

      That being said, 70% is definitely a high estimate. Most papers refuse to make a hard numerical estimate because of what a thorny topic it is.