• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    121 month ago

    I feel like most people who hate on 4e didn’t play it much, but enjoy feeling like they’re part of the group.

    • @Eranziel
      link
      121 month ago

      Yeah, 4e doesn’t deserve the hate it gets. I found it much more mechanically engaging to play than 3.X or 5e.

      4e was when WotC discovered D&D has a very large problem - it’s not allowed to change anything, for worse or better.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        91 month ago

        4e was when WotC discovered D&D has a very large problem - it’s not allowed to change anything, for worse or better.

        This is true.

        They’re so close to discovering dice pool with advantage/disadvantage.

        I started thinking about a 5e hack that converts the whole thing to a dice pool system. Instead of 1d20+X, it’s Xd20. You can then have degree of success via “how many dice hit the number?” and degree of difficulty via “you have to hit X times”

        There’s a ton of other stuff I’d love to see changed. Mostly around the adventuring day and only-spellcasters-get-cool-stuff

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 month ago

          That’s why 4E is so good. 4E says “all adventurers are magic users. Having muscles so big they bend reality in your favour is magic. Being great at inspiring your team is magic. Being able to blend into the shadows so well you were never even there is magic. Nobody is a boring normal in this system.”

          “Also here are abilities that recharge every encounter. Now you don’t have to worry about short rests.”

        • @Eranziel
          link
          21 month ago

          Well, I have good news! There’s a huge number of other systems out there, most of them are quite good, and there’s plenty of very interesting mechanical innovation going on. I encourage you to explore, D&D isn’t the only game in town. ;-)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            41 month ago

            I’m well aware. I have a weekly game of Fate, and played a lot of nWoD over the years. The trouble is usually finding players.

            Also sometimes players who only play D&D pick up bad habits and narrow views of things, and it can be hard to change their habits. In my Fate game, the players often forget the wide range of things they can spend fate points on,

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I was about to say, if you like dice pools try nWoD/CoD lol.

              As for FATE, my players have the same problem. And I forget to compel a lot of the time to give them FATE points, which doesn’t help, either.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                21 month ago

                In my first couple Fate games I didn’t get a lot of good compels in. But in this game my players have 3 aspects right now that are super easy to compel on:

                • “maybe the answer is violence”
                • “compulsive truth teller”
                • “[hostile NPC faction] bounty on your head”

                If the players are dicking around too much, compel on maybe the answer is violence - get in there and do something. Fucking around with the NPC instead of advancing the plot? Compel to tell the truth and let’s see what blows up. And if all else fails, fuck it, some goons from Razor can show up.

                It’s been a lot of fun.

                The players haven’t quite got a handle on self-compels yet, though.

    • @WarlockLawyer
      link
      41 month ago

      Agreed. With how many people started with 5e the older 3.5 cohort who shat all over 4e are in the minority. Plus I feel like a 5e player would more easily transfer over to 4e then 3.5