Edit:

The poll stopped me in my tracks but it’s actually even worse.

It should not take this long to get to imdb

Edit2: didn’t even realize it thinks I’ll “love it” based on things I look up. I don’t think I’d like it.

Edit³: IMDb was the example I used without thinking. I’m aware that there’s a link to it in the top card. It’s the other web results that I don’t already know about that I’d like to see. I now know there’s a hidden “web” tab. There’s also https://www.google.com/search?udm=14&q=example` but it’s still mildly infuriating that you have to know about these things to get the basic results we expected for years.

  • Jilanico
    link
    English
    2128 days ago

    Are they trying to train an AI?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      928 days ago

      I doubt it. They know I’m into audio production and this is kind of a softball question. Maybe if they start giving me more advanced ones.

      • Jilanico
        link
        English
        1728 days ago

        The Gemini logo next to the word “Experiment” makes me suspicious.

      • @Ziglin
        link
        English
        428 days ago

        I think it’s just something creators can do to boost gain extra impressions but apparently they don’t have to do it themselves anymore…

    • Eager Eagle
      link
      English
      428 days ago

      no, too stupid of a question

      • Jilanico
        link
        English
        228 days ago

        Simple questions with known answers might be a way to weed out malicious/untrustworthy responders.

        • Eager Eagle
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          Yes, control questions, in a form, with 20 other open-ended questions which answers actually have value.

          This is solely for engagement. Trivia questions have no value for training models.