The lawsuit claims that Dr. Kanokporn Tangsuan suffered a fatal allergic reaction after eating at a Disney Springs restaurant despite repeatedly informing the waiter of her severe allergy.

The lawsuit claims that Dr. Kanokporn Tangsuan suffered a fatal allergic reaction after eating at a Disney Springs restaurant despite repeatedly informing the waiter of her severe allergy.

  • @Kiernian
    55•3 months ago

    Event happened at raglan road Irish pub, when raglan road staff failed to do their job in regards to food allergens.

    Diner dies from anaphylaxis due to ingested dairy and nuts, which they were ASSURED BY THE WAITER WAS NOT IN ANY OF THEIR FOOD.

    Disney is calling for the lawsuit to be dismissed because her husband signed up for a one-month trial of the Disney+ streaming service years prior. The company says signing up for the trial requires users to arbitrate all disputes with the company

    • LustyArgonianEnglish
      21•3 months ago

      That’s insane. When are citizens going to be protected from fucking mandated forced arbitration???

      • @BenLeMan
        4•3 months ago

        Didn’t you know,? Protecting citizens is “communism” and therefore “un-American”.

    • @WindyRebel
      11•3 months ago

      Haven’t courts ruled that those terms and conditions aren’t totally enforceable since no one can really read and/or understand them all?

      This is a food issue and literally has nothing to do with any fucking digital agreement whatsoever. Full stop.

      • Kairos
        2•3 months ago

        I think in this case, it wouldn’t count because of the “of course the terms of service only applies to the service, dipshit” and maybe “hey how about you grow a pair of eyes and notice her husband is not the Lady herself”

        Edit: and maybe just a taste of “how about you go fuck yourself.”